Make a Submission
No. XXXIV (2012)
Articles

The dawning of a new era in social reaction to crime: promise, potential and limitations of restorative justice

PDF
  • Ezzat A. Fattah
Ezzat A. Fattah
Simon Fraser University, Vancouver
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2012A

Published 2012-01-01

Keywords

  • social reaction to crime,
  • criminology,
  • victim

How to Cite

Fattah, E. A. (2012). The dawning of a new era in social reaction to crime: promise, potential and limitations of restorative justice. Archives of Criminology, (XXXIV), 7–42. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2012A
Copyright Notice
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Despite dramatic social changes and unprecedented technological innovations penal philosophy has undergone little change. Retribution continues to be the key principle in sentencing and judges continue their hopeless struggle to make the punishment fit the crime. It is truly baffling that the CJS has remained archaic in its philosophy, its outlook and its tools and has remained insulated from whatever changes and advances that had taken place in modern society? For as yet unexplained reasons the system has resisted every attempt to modernize and change? This is probably why it is that despite the manifest advantages and benefits of R.J. over a punitive, retributive system, whose sole aim is to inflict pain and suffering on the wrong-doer, there is still reluctance to do away with the ideas of expiation and penitence in favor of reconciliation and compensation. The strong support for victims of crime, coupled with the undeniable fact that victims are the main losers in a punitive system of justice, have not yet succeeded in convincing politicians, lawmakers or the general public of the need to replace the medieval practice of punishment by a more constructive, more peaceful and less harmful means of dealing with crime and conflict. And yet, the destructive and detrimental effects of punishment are too evident to ignore. All this suggests that the time is right for a paradigm shift in society’s response to crime. There is a desperate need to move from philosophical abstraction to restorative action, from senseless retribution to meaningful restitution, from just deserts to restorative justice. But there is also a need for realism. R.J. is not a pana-cea. Although superior in every respect to retribution R.J. does have certain limitations and there are certain dangers to be avoided when moving towards the full implementation of a restorative justice system.

PDF

References

  1. Beccaria C., Dei Delitti e Delle Pene, Romæ 1764.
  2. Christie N., Conflicts as Property, „British Journal of Criminology” 1977, t. 17, nr 1.
  3. Christie N., Limits to Pain, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1982.
  4. Clear T.R., Harm in American Penology: offenders, Victims and their Communities, State University of New York Press, Albany 1994.
  5. Council of Europe Median in Penal Matters. Recommendation No. R (99) and Explanatory Memorandum, Council of Europe, Strasbourg 2000.
  6. Davis A., Are Prisons Obsolete?, Seven Stories Press, New York 2003.
  7. Davis G., Making Amends. Mediation and reparation in Criminal Justice, Routledge, London 1992.
  8. Dittenhoffer T., Ericson R., The Victim/Offender Reconciliation Programme: A message to the correctional reformers [w:] E.A. Fattah (ed.) Towards A Critical Victimology, Macmillan, London 1992.
  9. Drucker E., A Plague of Prisons. The Epidemiology of Mass Incarceration in America, The New Press, New York, London 2011.
  10. Fattah E.A., Beyond Metaphysics. The Need for a New Paradigm. On Actual and Potential Contributions of Criminology and the Social Sciences to the Reform of the Criminal Law [w:] R. Lahti, K. Nuotio (red.), Criminal Law Theory in Transition, Finnish Lawyers Publishing Company, Helsinki 1992.
  11. Fattah E.A., Criminology. Past, Present and Future – A Critical Overview, Macmillan, London 1997.
  12. Fattah E.A., From a Guilt Orientation to a Consequence Orientation [w:] F. Denker et. al. (red.), Beiträge zur Rechtswissenschaft, C.F. Muller, Heidelberg 1993.
  13. Fattah E.A., From a handful of Dollars to tea and Sympathy. The Sad History of Victim Assistance [w:] J.J.M. Van Dijk, R.G.H. Van Kaam, J. Wemmers (red.), Caring for Crime Victims: Selected Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Victimology, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey 1999, s. 187-206.
  14. Fattah E.A., From Crime Policy to Victim Policy – The Need for a Fundamental Policy Change [w:] M. McShane, F. Williams III (red.), Victims of Crime and the Victimization Process, Garland Publishing, New York 1997.
  15. Fattah E.A., From Philosophical Abstraction to Restorative Action – From Senseless Retribution to Meaningful Restitution. Just Desert and Restorative Justice revisited [w:] H.J. Kerner, E. Weitekanp (red.), Restorative Justice, Theoretical Foundations, Willan Publishing, Culmcott House, Devon 2002, s. 308-321.
  16. Fattah E.A., Gearing Justice Action to Victim Satisfaction. Contrasting Two Justice Philosophies. Retribution and Redress [w:] H. Kaptein, M. Malsch (red.) Crime, Victims and Justice – Essays on Principles and Practice, Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington 2004.
  17. Fattah E.A., How Valid are the Arguments Frequently Made Against Mediation and Restorative Justice? [w:] H. Giertsen (red.), Albanian and Norwegian Experiences with Mediation in Conflict, Dept. of Criminology, Univ. of Oslo, Oslo 2000.
  18. Fattah E.A., Is punishment the appropriate response to gross human rights violations? Is a non-punitive justice system feasible? [w:] E. van der Spuy, S. Parmentier, A. Dissel (red.), Restorative Justice. Politics, Policies and Prospects, Juta, Cape Town 2007.
  19. Fattah E.A., Is Restorative Justice a Viable Option in Crimes of Violence?, „Keio University Law Journal dedicated to the memory of Prof. Koichi Miyazawa” 2011, s. 713-730.
  20. Fattah E.A., Making the Punishment fit the Crime. The Case of Imprisonment. Problems Inherent in the use of Imprisonment as a Retributive Sanction, „Canadian Journal of Criminology” 1982, t. 24, nr 1, s. 1-12.
  21. Fattah E.A., Mediation in Penal Matters. Report for Correctional Services Canada, Ottawa 1999.
  22. Fattah E.A., Moving to the Right. A Return to Punishment?, „Crime and Justice” 1978, t. 6, nr 2, s. 79-92.
  23. Fattah E.A., Public Opposition to Prison Alternatives and Community Corrections. A Strategy for Action, „Canadian Journal of Criminology” 1982, t. 24, nr 4, s. 371-385.
  24. Fattah E.A., Restorative and Retributive Justice Models. A Comparison [w:] H.-H. Kühne (red.), Festschrift für Koichi Miyazawa, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden 1995, s. 305-315.
  25. Fattah E.A., Restorative and Retributive Justice Models. A Comparison [w:] E.A. Fattah, T. Peters (red.), Support for Crime Victims in a Comparative Perspective, Leuven University Press, Leuven 1998.
  26. Fattah E.A., Some Reflections on the Paradigm of Restorative Justice and its Viability for Juvenile Justice [w:] L. Walgrave (red.), Restorative Justice for Juveniles. Potentialities, Risks and Problems, Leuven University Press, Leuven 1998.
  27. Fattah E.A., Toward a Victim Policy Aimed at Healing not Suffering [w:] R.C. Davis, A.J. Lurigio, W.G. Skogan (red.), Victims of Crime (second edition), Sage Publications ,Thousand Oaks 1997, s. 257-272.
  28. Fattah E.A., Victim Redress and Victim-Offender Reconciliation in Theory and Practice. Some Personal Reflections, „The Hokkaigakuen Law Journal” 1999, t. XXXV, nr 1, s. 155-182.
  29. Fattah E.A., Victim Redress and Victim-Offender Reconciliation in Theory and Practice- Some Personal Refl ections, Resource Material Series no. 56, UNAFEI (Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders), Fuchu/ Tokyo 2000.
  30. Gopnik A., The Caging of America. Why do we lock up so many people?, „The New Yorker Magazine” z 30.01.2012.
  31. Presser L., Gaarder E., Can Restorative Justice Reduce Battering? Some Preliminary Considerations, „Social Justice” 2000, t. 27, nr 1, s. 175-195.
  32. Ranish D., Schichor D., The Victim’s Role in the Penal Process: Recent developments in California [w:] E.A. Fattah (red.), Towards A Critical Victimology, Macmillan, London 1992.
  33. Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press, Cambridge 1971.
  34. Siems L., The Torture Report, OR Books, New York 2011.
  35. Stewart B., (CBC) America’s “Prison Nation” Must we Follow suit?, CBC News 2.02.2012.
  36. Sykes G.M., The Pains of Imprisonment [w:] L. Radzinowicz, M.E. Wolfgang (red.), Crime & Justice. Vol. 3, The Criminal in confinement, Basic Press, New York 1971.
  37. Tonry M., The prospects for institutionalization of restorative justice initiatives in western countries [w:] I. Aertsen, T. Daems, L. Robert (red.), Institutionalizing Restorative Justice, Willan Publishing, Devon 2006.