Make a Submission
No. XLIV/1 (2022)
Articles

Populist and vindictive constructions of sexual offending, pluralities of violence, and the implications for criminal and social justice

Populistyczne oraz mściwe konstrukcje przestępstwa seksualnego, większość względna przemocy, i implikacje dla sprawiedliwości karnej i społecznej.

PDF
  • Ian Mahoney,
  • Kirsty Teague,
  • Matthew Long,
  • Belinda Winder
Ian Mahoney
Nottingham Trent University, Centre for Crime, Offending, Prevention and Engagement (COPE)
Bio
Kirsty Teague
Nottingham Trent University, Centre for Crime, Offending, Prevention and Engagement (COPE)
Bio
Matthew Long
Nottingham Trent University, Centre for Crime, Offending, Prevention and Engagement (COPE)
Bio
Belinda Winder
Nottingham Trent University, Centre for Crime, Offending, Prevention and Engagement (COPE)
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2021.26

Published 2023-02-15

Keywords

  • censure,
  • populism,
  • sexual offending,
  • social justice,
  • structural violence,
  • symbolic violence,
  • vindictiveness,
  • persons convicted of a sexual offence

How to Cite

Mahoney, I., Teague, K., Long, M., & Winder, B. (2023). Populist and vindictive constructions of sexual offending, pluralities of violence, and the implications for criminal and social justice: Populistyczne oraz mściwe konstrukcje przestępstwa seksualnego, większość względna przemocy, i implikacje dla sprawiedliwości karnej i społecznej . Archives of Criminology, (XLIV/1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2021.26
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Drawing upon the “sociology of vindictiveness” (Young 2003; 2007) and Sumner’s (1990; 1994) work on censure the authors examine the construal, responses and treatment of individuals who have committed a sexual offence against a child/children (ICSOAC).  We seek to understand the dynamics and social processes of the exclusion of others and the way negative, sectional and bureaucratised discourses, policies and practices can “other” marginalised groups, for political expediency. We argue that to fully understand these responses we need to better understand the wider social dynamics and constructions which inform and shape societal perceptions in pursuit of an essentialised “good enemy”.  In line with this, we go on to outline the interaction between vindictiveness and populism in the administration of justice and situate the challenges this poses for both punishment and the rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals convicted of sexual crime.

PDF

References

  1. Allardyce S. (2018). ʻSafer living foundation: The aurora project.ʼ In R. Lievesley, K. Hocken, H. Elliott, B. Winder, N. Blagden, and P. Banyard (eds.) Sexual Crime and Prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 1–25.
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  3. Angermeyer M.C. and Matschinger H. (2003). ʻThe stigma of mental illness: Effects of labelling on public attitudes towards people with mental disorder.ʼ Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 108(4), pp. 304–309.
  4. Becker H. (1963). Outsiders. Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Glencoe: Free Press.
  5. Beier K.M. (2019). ʻPreventing child sexual abuse and the use of child abuse images: The Prevention Project Dunkelfeld as an international perspective.ʼ The International Journal of Forensic Psychotherapy 1(1), pp. 61–66.
  6. Bennett J. (2008). The Social Costs of Dangerousness: Prison and the Dangerous Classes. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Available online: https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/Dangerousness_finalweb.pdf [26.03.2021].
  7. Blagden N. and Winder B. (2019). Helping to Rehabilitate Sex Offenders Is Controversial – but it Can Prevent More Abuse. The Conversation. Available online: https://theconversation.com/helping-to-rehabilitate-sex-offenders-is-controversial-but-it-can-prevent-more-abuse-111861 [24.09.2021].
  8. Blagden N., Perrin C., Smith S., Gleeson F., and Gillies L. (2017). ʻ“A different world” exploring and understanding the climate of a recently re-rolled sexual offender prison.ʼ Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(2), pp. 151–166.
  9. Blagden N., Winder B., and Lievesley R. (2020). ‘‘The resurrection after the old has gone and the new has come’: Understanding narratives of forgiveness, redemption and resurrection on Christian individuals serving time in custody for a sexual offence.’ Psychology, Crime and Law 26(1), pp. 34–52.
  10. Blagden N., Winder B., Thorne K., and Gregson M. (2011). ‘“No-one in the world would ever wanna speak to me again”. An interpretative phenomenological analysis into convicted sexual offenders’ accounts and experiences of maintaining and leaving denial.ʼ Psychology, Crime and Law 17(7), pp. 563–585.
  11. Bottoms A., Shapland J., Costello A., Holmes D., and Muir G. (2004). ʻTowards desistance: Theoretical underpinnings for an empirical study.ʼ The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 43(4), pp. 368–389.
  12. Bourdieu P. (1992) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Bourdieu P. (2002). ʻThe social conditions and the international circulation of ideas.ʼ Actes de la Reserche en Sciences Sociales 145(5), pp. 3–8.
  14. Brown K., Spencer J., and Deakin J. (2007). ʻThe reintegration of sex offenders: Barriers and opportunities for employment.ʼ The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 46(1), pp. 32–42.
  15. Cain D. (2021). ‘Too Soft’. Nicola McLean Says ‘I’d give Gary Glitter a Lethal Injection Before Covid Vaccine’ After Paedophile Gets Jab in Prison’, The Irish Sun. Available online: https://www.thesun.ie/tv/6534719/nicola-mclean-gary-glitter-lethal-injection-before-covid-vaccine/ [26.03.2021].
  16. Carter A.J. and Mann R.E. (2016). ʻThe strengths of treatment for sexual offending.ʼ In D.R. Laws and W. O’Donohue (eds.) Treatment of Sex Offenders. Springer: Cham, pp. 157–174.
  17. Chambliss W. (1974). Functional and Conflict Theories of Crime. New York: MSS Modular Publications.
  18. Cherney A. and Fitzgerald R. (2016). ʻFinding and keeping a job: The value and meaning of employment for parolees.ʼ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 60(1), pp. 21–37.
  19. Christie N. (1986). The Ideal Victim in Ezzat, AF (Ed) From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  20. Côté-Lussier C. and Carmichael J.T. (2018). ʻPublic support for harsh criminal justice policy and its moral and ideological tides.ʼ Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 24(2), pp. 235–247.
  21. Cox A. (2020). ʻThe language of incarceration.ʼ Incarceration 1(1), pp. 1–13. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2632666320940859.
  22. Digard L. (2014). ʻEncoding risk: Probation work and sex offenders’ narrative identities.ʼ Punishment & Society 16(4), pp. 428–447. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514539536.
  23. Douglas M. (2003). Risk and Blame. Mary Douglas. Collected Works. Volume XII. London: Routledge.
  24. Dum C.P., Socia K.M., Long B.L., and Yarrison F. (2020). ʻWould God forgive? Public attitudes toward sex offenders in places of worship.ʼ Sexual Abuse 32(5), pp. 567–590.
  25. Equality Act (2010). Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/part/2/chapter/2 [21.12.2021].
  26. Farmer M. (2017). Importance of Strengthening Prisoners’ Family Ties to Prevent Reoffending and Reduce Intergenerational Crime. London: Ministry of Justice. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/importance-of-strengthening-prisoners-family-ties-to-prevent-reoffending-and-reduce-intergenerational-crime [17.03.2021].
  27. Farmer M., McAlinden A.-M., and Maruna S. (2015). ʻUnderstanding desistance from sexual offending: A thematic review of research findings.ʼ Probation Journal 62(4), pp. 320–335.
  28. Farmer P. (2004). ʻAn anthropology of structural violence.ʼ Current Anthropology 45(3), pp. 305–325. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1086/382250.
  29. Farrall S. (2002). Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
  30. Fenwick M. (2013). ʻ‘Penal populism’ and criminological change in contemporary Japan.ʼ Theoretical Criminology 17(2), pp. 215–231.
  31. Furedi F. (2015). ʻThe moral crusade against paedophilia.ʼ In V.E. Cree, G. Clapton, and M. Smith (eds.) Revisiting Moral Panics. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 201–210.
  32. Galtung J. (1969). ʻViolence, peace, and peace research.ʼ Journal of Peace Research 6(3), pp. 167–191. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301.
  33. Galtung J. (1993). ʻKultuerlle gewaltʼ [Cultural violence]. Der Burger im Staat 43, pp. 341–366.
  34. Garland D. (2008). ʻOn the concept of moral panic.ʼ Crime, Media, Culture 4(1), pp. 9–30.
  35. Garland D. (2021). ʻWhat’s wrong with penal populism? Politics, the public and criminological expertise.ʼ Asian Journal of Criminology 16(4), pp. 257–277.
  36. Gidley J., Hampson G., Wheeler L., and Bereded-Samuel E. (2010). ʻSocial inclusion: Context, theory and practice.ʼ The Australasian Journal of University-Community Engagement 5, pp. 6–36.
  37. Gilligan J. (1997). Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic. New York: Vintage Books.
  38. Giordano P.C., Cernkovich S.A., and Rudolph J.L. (2002). ʻGender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation.ʼ American Journal of Sociology 107, pp. 990–1064.
  39. Göbbels S., Ward T., and Willis G.W. (2012). ʻAn integrative theory of desistance from sex offending.ʼ Aggression and Violent Behavior 17, pp. 453–462. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.003.
  40. Goffman E. (1990). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  41. Gramsci A. (1977). In Q. Hoare and J. Matthews (eds.) Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Political writings (1910-1920). New York: International Publishers.
  42. Gramsci A. (1978). In Q. Hoare (ed.) Selections from Political Writings (1921-1926). New York: International Publishers.
  43. Grover C. (2010). ʻSocial security policy and vindictivenessʼ. Sociological Research Online 15(2), pp. 1–12.
  44. Harper C. (2018). ʻThe role of the media in shaping responses to sexual offending.ʼ In H. Elliott, K. Hocken, R. Lievesley, N. Blagden, B. Winder, and P. Banyard (eds.) Sexual Crime and Circles of Support and Accountability. Switzerland: Springer International, pp. 127–150.
  45. Henley A. (2014). Abolishing the Stigma of Punishments Served. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Available online: https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/publications/cjm/article/abolishing-stigma-punishments-served [6.09.2021].
  46. Hocken K. (2018). ʻSafer living foundation: The aurora project.ʼ In R. Lievesley, K. Hocken, H. Elliott, B. Winder, N. Blagden, and P. Banyard (eds.) Sexual Crime and Prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 83–109.
  47. Jacobs G.M., Sevier M., and Teo W. (1998). ʻRipple effects: The case of gender-inclusive language.ʼ Asian Englishes 1(2), pp. 17–33.
  48. Jennings W., Farrall S., Gray E., and Hay C. (2017). ‘Penal populism and the public thermostat: Crime, public punitiveness and public policy.’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 30(3) pp. 463–481.
  49. Jewkes Y. (2013). ʻOnline child pornography, paedophilia and the sexualised child.ʼ In E. Quayle and K. Ribisi (eds.) Understanding and Preventing Online Sexual Exploitation of Children. London: Routledge, pp. 116–132.
  50. Johnson W.L. and Giordano P.C. (2020). ʻThe role of marriage and military service on reoffending: Race, “the respectability package,” and the desistance process.ʼ Armed Forces & Society 47(1), pp. 1–20.
  51. Kemshall H. and Maguire M. (2001). ‘Public protection, partnership and risk penality: The multi-agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders.’ Punishment and Society 3(2), pp. 237–264.
  52. Lacey N. (2019). ʻPopulism and the rule of law.ʼ Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15, pp. 79–96.
  53. Law V. and Roth R. (2015). Names Do Hurt: The Case Against Using Derogatory Language to Describe People in Prison, Rewire News. Available online: https://rewire.news/article/2015/04/20/case-using-deroga tory-language-describe-person-prison/ [23.03.2021].
  54. Laws D.R. (2000). ʻSexual offending as a public health problem: A North American perspective.ʼ Journal of Sexual Aggression 5(1), pp. 30–44.
  55. Lianos M. and Douglas M. (2000). ʻDangerization and the end of deviance. The institutional environment.ʼ British Journal of Criminology 40, pp. 261–278.
  56. Lowe G. and Willis G. (2020). ʻ“Sex offender” versus “person”: The influence of labels on willingness to volunteer with people who have sexually abused.ʼ Sexual Abuse 32(5), pp. 591–613.
  57. Mahoney I. and Kearon T. (2018). ʻSocial quality and Brexit in stoke-on-trent, England.ʼ International Journal of Social Quality 8(1), pp. 1–20.
  58. Malinen S., Willis G.M., and Johnston L. (2014). ʻMight informative media reporting of sexual offending influence community membersʼ attitudes towards sex offenders?.ʼ Psychology, Crime & Law 20(6), pp. 535–552.
  59. Mann R., Barnett G., Box G., Howard F.F., O’Mara O., Travers R., and Wakeling H. (2019). Rehabilitative culture in prisons for people convicted of sexual offending. In N. Blagden, B. Winder, K. Hocken, R. Lievesley, P. Banyard, and H. Elliot (eds.) Sexual Crime and the Experience of Imprisonment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–33.
  60. Marshall W.L. (2010). ʻThe role of attachments, intimacy, and loneliness in the etiology and maintenance of sexual offending.ʼ Sexual and Relationship Therapy 25(1), pp. 73–85.
  61. Maruna S. and Farrall S. (2004). ʻDesistance from crime: A theoretical reformulation.ʼ Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 43, pp. 171–194.
  62. Maruna S. and Roy K. (2007). ʻAmputation or reconstruction? Notes on the concept of “knifing off” and desistance from crime.ʼ Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 23(1), pp. 104–124.
  63. McAlinden A.M. (2014). ʻDeconstructing victim and offender identities in discourses on child sexual abuse: Hierarchies, blame and the good/evil dialectic.ʼ British Journal of Criminology 54(2), pp. 180–198.
  64. Mikelatou A. and Arvanitis E. (2018). ʻSocial inclusion and active citizenship under the prism of neoliberalism: A critical analysis of the European Union’s discourse of lifelong learning.ʼ Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(5), pp. 499–509.
  65. Morgan K. and Björkert S.T. (2006). ʻ‘Iʼd rather youʼd lay me on the floor and start kicking me’: Understanding symbolic violence in everyday life.ʼ Womenʼs Studies International Forum 29(5), pp. 441–452.
  66. Padfield N. and Maruna S. (2006). ʻThe revolving door at the prison gate: Exploring the dramatic increase in recalls to prison.ʼ Criminology & Criminal Justice 6(3), pp. 329–352. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806065534.
  67. Pandeli J. and O’Regan N. (2019). ʻRisky business? The value of employing offenders and ex-offenders: An interview with James Timpson, Chief Executive of Timpson.ʼ Journal of Management Inquiry 29(2), pp. 1–8.
  68. Pratt J. (2007). Penal Populism. London: Routledge.
  69. Pratt J. (2020). Law, Insecurity and Risk Control: Neo-Liberal Governance and the Populist Revolt. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  70. Pullman L., Stephens S., and Seto M.C. (2016). ʻA motivation-facilitation model of adult male sexual offending.ʼ In C.A. Cuevas and C.M. Rennison (eds.) The Wiley Handbook on the Psychology of Violence. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 482–500.
  71. Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Shuster.
  72. Ramsay L., Carter A.J., and Walton J.S. (2020). ʻContemporary programs designed for the tertiary prevention of recidivism by people convicted of a sexual offense: A review, and the UK perspective.ʼ In J. Proulx, F. Cortoni, L.A. Craig, and E. Letourneau (eds.) The Wiley Handbook of What Works with Sexual Offenders: Contemporary Perspectives in Theory, Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention. Hoboken: NJ Wiley, Blackwell, pp. 185–199.
  73. Ranulf S. (1964 [1938]). Moral Indignation and Middle Class Psychology. New York: Schocken.
  74. Robbers M.L. (2009). ʻLifers on the outside: Sex offenders and disintegrative shaming.ʼ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 53(1), pp. 5–28.
  75. Ruiz Y.A. (2018). ʻPunitive populism and symbolic criminal law.ʼ Inciso 20(1), pp. 37–45.
  76. Sales D. (2021). Colin Pitchfork Victim’s Sister Says Double Child Killer and Rapist Should Be Castrated and Have the Word ‘Nonce’ Tattooed on His Forehead After Parole Board Said He Should Be Freed, The Daily Mail. Available online: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9786813/Colin-Pitchfork-victims-sister-says-double-child-killer-rapist-castrated.html [28.07.2021].
  77. Samet R. (2013). ʻThe photographer’s body: Populism, polarization, and the uses of victimhood in Venezuela.ʼ American Ethnologist 40(3), pp. 525–539.
  78. Samet R. (2019). The subject of wrongs: Crime, populism and Venezuela’s punitive turn. Cultural Anthropology 34(2), pp. 272–298.
  79. Saunders L. (2020). ʻThe transition from prison to the community of people convicted of sexual offences: Police and practice recommendations.ʼ Prison Service Journal 251, pp. 11–18.
  80. Sparks R. (2003). ʻState of insecurity: Punishment, populism and contemporary political culture.ʼ In S. McConville (ed.) The Use of Punishment. London: Routledge, pp. 149–174.
  81. Stone R. (2016). ʻDesistance and identity repair: Redemption narratives as resistance to stigma.ʼ The British Journal of Criminology 56(5), pp. 956–975.
  82. Sumner C. (1990). Censure, Politics and Criminal Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  83. Sumner C. (1994). The Sociology of Deviance. An Obituary. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  84. Tovey L., Winder B., and Blagden N. (forthcoming). ‘‘It’s okay if you are in for robbery or murder but, sex offenders, that’s a no no’: A qualitative analysis of the experience of seeking employment by individuals with a sexual conviction.’ Psychology, Crime and Law.
  85. Vera E.M. and Speight S.L. (2003). ʻMulticultural competence, social justice, and counselling psychology: Expanding our roles.ʼ The Counseling Psychologist 31, pp. 253–272.
  86. Walton J.S., Ramsay L., Cunningham C., and Henfrey S. (2017). ʻNew directions: Integrating a biopsychosocial approach in the design and delivery of programs for high risk services users, Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service. Advancing corrections.ʼ Journal of the International Corrections and Prison Association 3, pp. 21–47.
  87. Ward T. and Gannon T.A. (2006). ʻRehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders.ʼ Aggression and Violent Behaviour 11(1), pp. 77–94.
  88. Ward T. and Marshall W.L. (2004). ʻGood lives, aetiology and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: A bridging theory.ʼ Journal of Sexual Aggression 10(2), pp. 153–169.
  89. Ward T. and Stewart C.A. (2003). ʻThe treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives.ʼ Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34(4), pp. 353–360. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.353.
  90. Ward T., Keenan T., and Hudson S.M. (2000). ʻUnderstanding cognitive affective, and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A developmental perspective.ʼ Aggression and Violent Behavior 5(1), pp. 41–62.
  91. Ward T., Mann R.E., and Gannon T.A. (2006). ʻThe good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications.ʼ Aggression and Violent Behavior 12(1), pp. 87–107. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.004.
  92. Weaver B. (2012). ʻThe relational context of desistance: Some implications and opportunities for social policy.ʼ Social Policy and Administration 46(4), pp. 395–412.
  93. Weaver B. and McNeill F. (2015). ʻLifelines: Desistance, social relations, and reciprocity.ʼ Criminal Justice and Behavior 42(1), pp. 95–107.
  94. Willis G.M. (2018). ʻWhy call someone by what we don’t want them to be? The ethics of labelling in forensic/correctional psychology.ʼ Psychology, Crime & Law 24(7), pp. 727–743.
  95. Willis G.M. and Letourneau E.J. (2018). ʻPromoting accurate and respectful language to describe individuals and groups.ʼ Sexual Abuse 30(5) pp. 480–483.
  96. Winder B., Blagden N., and Lievesley R. (2018). ʻ“Because you’ve got faith it doesn’t mean that you’ve got wings on your back”: A qualitative analysis of the accounts of Christian prisoners serving time for a sexual offence.ʼ Journal of Sexual Aggression 24(2), pp. 240–256.
  97. Winder B., Scott S., Underwood M., and Blagden N. (2021). Recommended Terminology Concerning People with a Criminal Conviction. COPE Practice Brief 01/21. NTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University.
  98. Winters G.M., Jeglic E.L., Calkins C., and Blasko B.L. (2017). ʻSex offender legislation and social control: An examination of sex offenders’ expectations prior to release.ʼ Criminal Justice Studies 30(2), pp. 202–222.
  99. World Health Organization (2018). International Classification of Diseases for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (11th Revision), Icd.who.int. Available online: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en [26.03.2021].
  100. Young J. (1999). The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime and Difference in Late Modernity. London: Sage.
  101. Young J. (2003). ʻMerton with energy, Katz with structure: The sociology of vindictiveness and the criminology of transgression.ʼ Theoretical Criminology 7(3), pp. 389–414.
  102. Young J. (2007). The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London: SAGE