No. XLIV/2 (2022)
Articles

The contemporary American juvenile justice system: Revisiting parens patriae

Współczesny amerykański wymiar sprawiedliwości dla nieletnich. Ponowne spojrzenie na parens patriae

Katarzyna Celinska
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Amina Cheboubi
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Master Program in Criminal Justice

Published 2022-10-24

Keywords

  • juvenile justice system,
  • parens patriae,
  • getting tough on crime,
  • In re Gault,
  • discrimination in the juvenile justice system,
  • juvenile process,
  • the Supreme Court cases

How to Cite

Celinska, K., & Cheboubi, A. (2022). The contemporary American juvenile justice system: Revisiting parens patriae: Współczesny amerykański wymiar sprawiedliwości dla nieletnich. Ponowne spojrzenie na parens patriae. Archives of Criminology, (XLIV/2), pp. 41–60. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2022.04

Abstract

The American juvenile justice system has undergone significant transformations since itsinception in the late 19th century. In this paper, the authors seek to analyze the historical context of and subsequent reforms to the juvenile system and process in order to determine whether they remain true to their origins of the legal doctrine of parens patriae. Specifically, the authors contrast rehabilitative notions of parens patriae with the “tough on crime” perspective that developed in the 1990s in response to rising crime rates. This debate is illustrated by landmark Supreme Court cases, waivers to the adult system, increases in the use of detention, and the use of “evidence-based programs” to curb further delinquency and prevent violence. The discussion also focuses on the prevalence of systemic racial, ethnic, and gender discrimination, which calls into question the utility of parens patriae and the overall effectiveness of the juvenile justice system.

References

  1. Applegate B.K., Davis R.K., and Cullen F.T. (2009). ʻReconsidering child saving: The extent and correlates of public support for excluding youths from the juvenile court.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 55(1), pp. 51–77.
  2. Bartollas C., Schmalleger F., and Turner M.G. (2019). Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Pearson.
  3. Beger R.R. (1994). ʻIllinois juvenile justice: An emerging dual system.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 40(1), pp. 54–68.
  4. Bick J. and Nelson C.A. (2016). ʻEarly adverse experiences and the developing brain.ʼ Neuropsychopharmacology 41(1), pp. 177–196.
  5. Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development (n.d.). Standards of Evidence. Full Reference, Blueprintsprograms.org. Available online: https://www.blueprintsprograms.org [05.07.2022].
  6. Bouchard J. and Wong S.J. (2018). ʻExamining the effects of intensive supervision and aftercare programs for at-risk youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.ʼ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 62(6), pp. 1509–1534.
  7. Brannen D.N., Salekin R.T., Zapf P.A., Salekin K.L., Kubak F.A., and DeCoster J. (2006). ʻTransfer to adult court: A national study of how juvenile court judges weigh pertinent Kent criteria.ʼ Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12(3), pp. 332–355.
  8. Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. Supreme Court 519 (1975). Available online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/421/519/ [05.07.2022].
  9. Burrow J. (2008). ʻReverse waiver and the effects of legal, statutory, and secondary legal factors on sentencing outcomes for juvenile offenders.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 54(1), pp. 34–64.
  10. Caldwell M., Skeem J., Salekin R., and Van Rybroek G. (2006). ʻTreatment response of adolescent offenders with psychopathy features: A 2-year follow-up.ʼ Criminal Justice and Behavior 33(5), pp. 571–596.
  11. Caldwell M.F. and Van Rybroek G.J. (2005). ʻReducing violence in serious juvenile offenders using intensive treatment.ʼ International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 28(6), pp. 622–636.
  12. Celinska K., Sung H., Kim Ch., and Valdimarsdottir M. (2019). ʻAn outcome evaluation of Functional Family Therapy for court-involved youth.ʼ Journal of Family Therapy 41(2), pp. 251–276.
  13. Curtis G.B. (1976). ʻThe checkered career of parens patriae: The state as parent or tyrant.’ DePaul Law Review 25(4), pp. 895–915.
  14. Ehrmann S., Hyland N., and Puzzanchera Ch. (2019). Girls in the Juvenile Justice System. Laurel: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Available online: https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh176/files/pubs/251486.pdf [05.07.2022].
  15. Farrington D.P. (2017). ʻPreventing the transition from juvenile delinquency to adult crime.ʼ Journal of Community Corrections 26(3), pp. 5–16.
  16. Feld B.C. (1988). ʻIn re Gault revisited: A cross-state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 34(4), pp. 393–424.
  17. Feld B.C. (2018). ʻPunishing kids in juvenile and criminal courts.ʼ Crime and Justice 47(1), pp. 417–474.
  18. Ferdinand T.N. (1991). ʻHistory overtakes the juvenile justice system.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 37(2), pp. 204–224.
  19. Fox J.A. (1996). Trends in Juvenile Violence: A Report to the United States Attorney General on Current and Future Rates of Juvenile Offending. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States Department of Justice. Available online: https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/tjvfox.pdf [05.07.2022].
  20. Goldstein N.E., Giallella C.L., Haney-Caron E., Peterson L., Serico J., Kemp K., and Lochman J. (2018). ʻJuvenile Justice Anger Management (JJAM) treatment for girls: Results of a randomized controlled trial.ʼ Psychological Services 15(4), pp. 386–397.
  21. Greenwood P. and Turner S. (2009). ʻAn overview of prevention and intervention programs for juvenile offenders.ʼ Victims and Offenders 4(4), pp. 365–374.
  22. Henggeler S.W. and Schoenwald S.K. (2011). ʻEvidence‐based interventions for juvenile offenders and juvenile justice policies that support them and commentaries.ʼ Social Policy Report 25(1), pp. 1–28.
  23. Hockenberry S. (2021). Delinquency Cases Waived to Criminal Court, 2018. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Available online: https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/publications/delinquency-cases-waived-2018.pdf [05.07.2022].
  24. In re Gault, 387 U.S. Supreme Court 1 (1967). Available online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/1/ [05.07.2022].
  25. In re Winship, 397 U.S. Supreme Court 358 (1970). Available online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/397/358/ [05.07.2022].
  26. Jordan K.L. and Myers D.L. (2011). ʻJuvenile transfer and deterrence: Reexamining the effectiveness of a “get-tough” policy.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 57(2), pp. 247–270.
  27. Katsjura A. (2019). Women’s Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2019, Prisonpolicy.org. Available online: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2019women.html [05.07.2022].
  28. Kavanaugh B.C., Dupont-Frechette J.A., Jerskey B.A., and Holler K.A. (2017). ʻNeurocognitive deficits in children and adolescents following maltreatment: Neurodevelopmental consequences and neuropsychological implications of traumatic stress.ʼ Applied Neuropsychology: Child 6(1), pp. 64–78.
  29. Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. Supreme Court 541 (1966). Available online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/383/541/ [05.07.2022].
  30. Lanza-Kaduce L., Lane J., Bishop D.M., and Frazier C.E. (2005). ʻJuvenile offenders and adult felony recidivism: The impact of transfer.ʼ Journal of Crime and Justice 28(1), pp. 59–77.
  31. Lee S.J. and Kraus L.J. (2016). ʻTransfer of juvenile cases to criminal court.ʼ Child Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 25(1), pp. 41–47.
  32. Lehmann P.S., Chiricos T., and Bales W.D. (2018). ʻJuveniles on trial: Mode of conviction and the adult court sentencing of transferred juveniles.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 64(5), pp. 563–586.
  33. Lipsey M.W. (2008). The Arizona Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) for Assessing the Effectiveness of Programs for Juvenile Probationers: SPEP Ratings and Relative Recidivism Reduction for the Initial SPEP Sample. Nashville: Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology. Available online: https://my.vanderbilt.edu/spep/files/2013/04/AZ-Recidivism-Report_final-revised.pdf [07.07.2022].
  34. Lipsey M.W., Howell J.C., Kelly M.R., Chapman G., and Carver D. (2010). Improving the Effectiveness of Juvenile Justice Programs. Washington DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform at Georgetown University.
  35. Loughran T.A., Mulvey E.P., Schubert C.A., Chassin L.A., Steinberg L., Piquero A.R., and Losoya S. (2010). ʻDifferential effects of adult court transfer on juvenile offender recidivism.ʼ Law and Human Behavior 34(6), pp. 476–488.
  36. Lurigio A., Bensiger G., and Thompson S.R. (2000). A Process and Outcome Evaluation of Project BUILD: Years 5 and 6. Unpublished Report. Chicago: Loyola University, Department of Criminal Justice.
  37. Macaluso L. and Soler M. (2021). ʻRedefining parens patriae to address structural racism in the juvenile justice system.ʼ Juvenile Justice Update 24(4), pp. 3–4, 18–20.
  38. Madison J. (2012). ʻCoercion, if coercion be necessary: The educational function of the New York House of Refuge, 1824–1874.ʼ American Educational History Journal 39(1–2), pp. 401–416.
  39. Matjasko J.L., Vivolo-Kantor A.M., Massetti G.M., Holland K.M., Holt M.K., and Cruz J.D. (2012). ʻA systematic meta-review of evaluations of youth violence prevention programs: Common and divergent findings from 25 years of meta-analyses and systematic reviews.ʼ Aggression and Violent Behavior 17(6), pp. 540–552.
  40. McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. Supreme Court 528 (1971). Available online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/528/ [05.07.2022].
  41. McNally R.B. (1982). ʻNearly a century later: The child-savers-child advocates and the juvenile justice system.ʼ Juvenile & Family Court Journal 33(3), pp. 47–52.
  42. Mears D.P. (2003). ʻA critique of waiver research: Critical next steps in assessing the impacts of laws for transferring juveniles to the criminal justice system.ʼ Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 1(2), pp. 156–172.
  43. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [OJJDP] (1999). ʻAn evolving juvenile court: On the front lines with Judge J. Dean Lewis.ʼ Juvenile Justice 6(2), pp. 3–12.
  44. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [OJJDP] (2015). Status Offenders, Ojjdp.ojp.gov. Available online: https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/mpg/literature-review/status-offenders.pdf [05.07.2022].
  45. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [OJJDP] (2017). Diversion from Formal Juvenile Court Processing, Ojjdp.ojp.gov. Available online: https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh176/files/media/document/diversion_programs.df [05.07.2022].
  46. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [OJJDP] (2020a). Provisions for Imposing Adult Sanctions on Juvenile Offenders, 2018, Ojjdp.gov. Available online: https://www.ojjdp.gov/OJSTATBB/structure_process/qa04115.asp?qaDate=2018 [05.07.2022].
  47. Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention [OJJDP] (2020b). Demographic Characteristics of Juvenile Arrests, 2019, Ojjdp.gov. Available online: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/qa05104.asp?qaDate=2019 [05.07.2022].
  48. Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention [OJJDP] (2021). Race/Ethnicity Profile of Juvenile Offenders in Residential Placement, 2019, Ojjdp.gov. Available online: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/corrections/qa08205.asp?qaDate=2019 [05.07.2022].
  49. Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention [OJJDP] (n.d.). Model Programs Guide, Ojjdp.ojp.gov. Available online: https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/model-programs-guide/about-mpg [05.07.2022].
  50. Pappas L.N. and Dent A.L. (2021). ʻThe 40-year debate: A meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders.ʼ Journal of Experimental Criminology. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z [05.07.2022].
  51. Parrish D.E. (2020). ʻAchieving justice for girls in the juvenile justice system.ʼ Social Work 65(2), pp. 149–158.
  52. Pisciotta A.W. (1983). ʻScientific reform: The “New Penology” at Elmira, 1876–1900.ʼ Crime & Delinquency 29(4), pp. 613–630.
  53. Pisciotta A.W. (1985). ʻTreatment on trial: The rhetoric and reality of the New York House of Refuge, 1857–1935.ʼ The American Journal of Legal History 29(2), pp. 151–181.
  54. Platt A. (1969). ʻThe rise of the child-saving movement: A study in social policy and correctional reform.ʼ The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 381(1), pp. 21–38.
  55. Platt A. (2009). The Child Savers. The Invention of Delinquency. The 40th Anniversary Edition. New Brunswick, New Jersey, London: Rutgers University Press.
  56. Puzzanchera Ch. (2021). Juvenile Arrests, 2019. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Available online: https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/publications/juvenile-arrests-2019.pdf [05.07.2022].
  57. Puzzanchera Ch., Stahl A.L., Finnegan T.A., Snyder H.N., Poole R.S., and Tierney N. (2000). Juvenile Court Statistics 1997. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
  58. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. Supreme Court 551 (2005). Available online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/543/551 [05.07.2022].
  59. Rovner J. (2016). Racial Disparities in Youth Commitments and Arrests, Sentencingproject.org. Available online: https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/racial-disparities-in-youth-commitments-and-arrests/ [05.07.2022].
  60. Rovner J. (2021). Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview, Sentencingproject.org. Available online: https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/juvenile-life-without-parole/ [05.07.2022].
  61. Ryan J.P., Abrams L.S., and Huang H. (2014). ʻFirst-time violent juvenile offenders: Probation, placement, and recidivism.ʼ Social Work Research 38(1), pp. 7–18.
  62. Sawyer W. (2019). Youth Confinement: The Whole Pie 2019, Prisonpolicy.org. Available online: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/youth2019.html [05.07.2022].
  63. Schwalbe C.S., Gearing R.E., MacKenzie M.J., Brewer K.B., and Ibrahim R. (2012). ʻA meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders.ʼ Clinical Psychology Review 32(1), pp. 26–33.
  64. Sickmund M., Sladky T.J., Puzzanchera Ch., and Kang W. (2022). Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, Ojjdp.org. Available online: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/ [05.07.2022].
  65. The Sentencing Project (2019). Youth Sentenced to Life Imprisonment, Sentencingproject.org. Available online: https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/youth-sentenced-life-imprisonment/ [05.07.2022].
  66. Thorson A.M. (1999). ʻFrom parens patriae to crime control: A comparison of the history and effectiveness of the juvenile justice systems in the United States and Canada.ʼ Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 16, pp. 845–871.
  67. Van der Stouwe T., Asscher J.J., Stams G.J.J., Deković M., and van der Laan P.H. (2014). ʻThe effectiveness of multisystemic therapy (MST): A meta-analysis.ʼ Clinical Psychology Review 34(6), pp. 468–481.
  68. Weston B. (2016). ʻBalancing rehabilitation and punishment: Combing juvenile court waiver mechanisms to create a balanced justice system.ʼ American Criminal Law Review 53(1), pp. 235–254.
  69. Widom C.S. (1992). The Cycle of Violence. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice: Washington DC.
  70. Willrich M. (2003). The City of Courts. Socializing Justice in progressive Era Chicago. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  71. Zane S.N. (2017). ʻDo criminal court outcomes vary by juvenile transfer mechanism? A multi-jurisdictional, multilevel analysis.ʼ Justice Quarterly 34(3), pp. 542–569.
  72. Zimring F.E. (2005). American Juvenile Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.