Make a Submission
No. XLV/2 (2023)
Articles

Penal exceptionalism in countries of Central Europe. Why is the region different?

Odrębność penalna krajów Europy Środkowej. Dlaczego ten region jest inny?

PDF
  • Krzysztof Piotr Krajewski
Krzysztof Piotr Krajewski
Uniwersytet Jagielloński
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.09

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • penal policies,
  • punitiveness of criminal justice,
  • penal exceptionalism,
  • incarceration rates,
  • penal climate

How to Cite

Krajewski, K. P. (2023). Penal exceptionalism in countries of Central Europe. Why is the region different? Odrębność penalna krajów Europy Środkowej. Dlaczego ten region jest inny?. Archives of Criminology, (XLV/2), 171–211. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.09
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The countries of Central Europe have for many years occupied a leading position in Europe when it comes to the level of incarceration. This begs the question of what lies behind this state of affairs. It may be connected with the history of the region, being under authoritarian rule for years. Another factor may be the penal populism that is present everywhere in the world, but has specific features in this region. One version of such explanations is the concept of “penal nationalism”. The research also indicates a relationship between social policy and egalitarianism, among other factors, and the size of the prison population. This raises the question of the extent to which the concepts relativizing punitiveness to categories of political economy apply to the region. Finally, there are other explanations that point to some prosaic factors of a “technical” nature that may have an undesirable influence on punitiveness. None of these concepts fully explain the unique situation of the region as a whole. However, they can be a starting point for building a more integrated concept.

PDF

References

  1. Aebi M., Burkhardt Ch., Hacin R., and Tiago M.M. (2016). ‘A comparative perspective of imprisonment trends in Slovenia and Europe from 2005 to 2014.’ Revija za Kriminalistiko in Kriminologijo 67(4), pp. 430–442.
  2. Barker V. (2012) ‘Nordic exceptionalism revisited: Explaining the paradox of a Janus-faced penal regime.’ Theoretical Criminology 17(1), pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612468935
  3. Baumann Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press: Cambridge, Boston.
  4. Bencze M. (2022). ‘ʻEveryday judicial populism’ in Hungary.’ Review of Central and East European Law 47, pp. 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10062
  5. Boda Z., Tóth M., Hollán M., and Bartha A. (2022). ‘Two decades of penal populism – the case of Hungary.’ Review of Central and East European Law 47(1), pp. 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10060
  6. Brandariz-Garcia J. (2018). ‘An enduring sovereign mode of punishment: Post-dictatorial penal policies in Spain.’ Punishment & Society 20(3), pp. 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745166812
  7. Cavadino M. and Dignan J. (2006). Penal Systems. A Comparative Approach. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280430
  8. Cheliotis L.K. and Xenakis S. (2016) ʻPunishment and political systems; State punitiveness in post-dictatorial Greece.ʼ Punishment & Society 18(3), pp. 268–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516645690
  9. Christie N. (2000). Crime Control as Industry. Towards Gulags Western Style. London, New York: Routledge.
  10. Cullen F.T. (2022). ‘The end of American exceptionalism: Enlightened corrections.’ Criminology & Public Policy 21(4), pp. 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12605
  11. Downes D. (2012). ‘Political economy, welfare and punishment in comparative perspective.’ In S. Snacken and E. Dumortier (eds.) Resisting Punitiveness in Europe? Welfare, Human Rights, and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 23–34.
  12. Downes D. and Swaaningen R. van (2007). ‘The road to dystopia? Changes in the penal climate of the Netherlands.’ Crime and Justice 35, pp. 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/650186
  13. Drápal J. (2021). ‘Punitive by negligence? The myths and reality of penal nationalism in the Czech Republic.’ European Journal of Criminology 20(4), pp. 1187–1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211063753
  14. Dünkel F. (2017). ‘European penology: The rise and fall of prison population rates in Europe in times of migrant crises and terrorism.ʼ European Journal of Criminology 14(6), pp. 629–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817733961
  15. Flander B. and Meško G. (2016). ‘Penal and prison policy on the ‘sunny side of the Alps’: The swan song of Slovenian exceptionalism?.’ European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 22(4), pp. 565–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9299-1
  16. Fonseca D.S. (2023). ‘Between democratic modernization and authoritarian punitiveness in Brazil: Mass incarceration, political rationalities and the dynamics of subnational variation.’ The British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azad050.
  17. Garland D. (2001). The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Garland D. (2020). ‘Penal controls and social controls: Toward a theory of American exceptionalism.’ Punishment & Society 22(3), pp. 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474519881992
  19. Gönczöl K. (2022). ‘ʻLet there be order!’: Rising criminal populism in Hungary.’ Archiwum Kryminologii 44(1), pp. 107–122. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2021.06
  20. Green D.A. (2009) ‘Feeding wolves. Punitiveness and culture.ʼ European Journal of Criminology 6(6), pp. 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370809341227
  21. Haney L. (2016). ‘Prisons of the past: Penal nationalism and the politics of punishment in Central Europe.’ Punishment & Society 18(3), pp. 346–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516645686
  22. Jasiński J. (1973). ‘Punitywność systemów karnych. Rozważania nad zakresem, formami i intensywnością penalizacji’ [The punitiveness of the criminal justice system. Considerations on the forms and scope of penalization]. Studia Prawnicze 35, pp. 21–61. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.1973.35.2
  23. Jasiński J. (1976). ‘The punitiveness of the criminal justice system (A cross-national perspective).’ The Polish Sociological Bulletin 33, pp. 43–51.
  24. Jasiński J. (1984). ‘Punitywność systemów karnych (Kontynuacje)’ [The punitiveness of the criminal justice systems (continuations)]. Państwo i Prawo 39(6), pp. 52–66.
  25. Kerezsi K. and Lévay M. (2008). ‘Criminology, crime and criminal justice in Hungary.’ European Journal of Criminology 5(2), pp. 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807087646
  26. Krajewski K. (2004). ‘Crime and criminal justice in Poland.’ European Journal of Criminology 1(3), pp. 377–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370804044006
  27. Krajewski K. (2009). ‘Punitive attitudes in Poland – the development in the last years.’ European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 15, pp. 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9092-5
  28. Krajewski K. (2012). ‘Prosecutors and prosecution in Poland: In quest of independence.’ Crime and Justice 41, pp. 75–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/665611
  29. Krajewski K. (2013). ‘Penal developments in Poland: New or old punitiveness.’ In T. Daems, D. van Zyl Smit, and S. Snacken (eds.) European Penology?. Oxford, Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, pp. 311–338.
  30. Krajewski K. (2014) ‘Different penal climates in Europe.’ Kriminologijos Studjos 1, pp. 86–111. https://doi.org/10.15388/CrimLithuan.2014.1.3678
  31. Krajewski K. (2016). ‘Sentencing in Poland: Failed attempts to reduce punitiveness’. Crime and Justice 45, pp. 175–219. https://doi.org/10.1086/685539
  32. Krajewski K. (2019) ‘O wpływie prawa karnego na politykę karną’ [Impact of penal law on penal policy]. Archiwum Kryminologii 41(2), pp. 41–80. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2019N
  33. Kury H. (1993). ‘Crime in East and West Germany – results of the first intra-German victims study.ʼ In W. Bilsky, Ch. Pfeiffer, and P. Wetzels (eds.) Fear of Crime and Criminal Victimization. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag, pp. 213–230.
  34. Kury H., Obergfell-Fuchs J., Woessner G., and Wuerger M. (2002). ʻFear of crime and victimization.’ In P. Nieuwbeerta (ed.) Crime Victimization in Comparative Perspective. Results from the International Crime Victims Survey, 1989–2000. Den Haag: Boom Jurisische uitgevers, pp. 317–334.
  35. Lacey N. (2008). The Prisoners’ Dilemma. Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819247
  36. Lappi-Seppälä T. (2007). ‘Penal policy in Scandinavia.’ Crime and Justice 36, pp. 217–295. https://doi.org/10.1086/592812
  37. Lappi-Seppälä T. (2008). ‘Trust, welfare, and political culture: Explaining differences in national penal policies.’ Crime and Justice 37, pp. 313–387. https://doi.org/10.1086/525028
  38. Lappi-Seppälä T. (2011). ‘Explaining imprisonment in Europe.ʼ European Journal of Criminology 8(4), pp. 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811411459
  39. Lappi-Seppälä T. and Tonry M. (2011). ‘Crime, criminal justice and criminology in the Nordic Countries.’ Crime and Justice 40, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/660822
  40. Lévay M. (2000). ‘Social changes and rising crime rates: The case of Central and Eastern Europe.’ European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 8(1), pp. 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718170020519021
  41. Lévay M. (2012a). ‘Human rights and penalization in Central and Eastern Europe: The case of Hungary.’ In S. Snacken and E. Dumortier (eds.) Resisting Punitiveness in Europe? Welfare, Human Rights, and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 133–155.
  42. Lévay M. (2012b). ‘Penal policy, crime and political change.’ In A. Šelih and A. Završnik (eds.) Crime and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Springer, pp. 117–153.
  43. Lévay M. (2016). ‘Constitutionalising life imprisonment without parole: The case of Hungary.ʼ In D. van Zyl Smit and S. Snacken (eds.) Life Imprisonment and Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 167–187.
  44. Los M. (2002). ‘Post-communist fear of crime and the commercialization of security.’ Theoretical Criminology 6(2), pp. 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/136248060200600203
  45. Los M. and Zybertowicz A. (2000). Privatizing the Police-State. The Case of Poland. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  46. Meško G. and Jere M. (2012). ‘Crime, criminal justice and criminology in Slovenia.’ European Journal of Criminology 9(3), pp. 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812440064
  47. Meško G., Fields Ch., and Smole T. (2011). ‘A concise overview of penology and penal practice in Slovenia: The unchanged capacity, new standards, and prison overcrowding.ʼ The Prison Journal 91(4), pp. 398–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511424389
  48. Mycka K. and Kozłowskim T. (2013). ‘Paradoksy polskiej polityki karnej, czyli jak zapełniamy więzienia nadużywają środków probacji’ [Paradoxes of Polish sentencing policies, or how to fill up prisons by abusing probation]. Probacja 2, pp. 5–38.
  49. Pomorski S. (1981). ‘Communists and their criminal law: Reflections on Igor Andrejew’s “Outlines of the criminal law of socialist states.”ʼ Review of Socialist Law 7, pp. 7–34.
  50. Pratt J. (2007). Penal Populism. London, New York: Routledge.
  51. Pratt J. (2008a). ‘Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part I the nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism.’ The British Journal of Criminology 48(2), pp. 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm072
  52. Pratt J. (2008b). ‘Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part II does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future?.’ The British Journal of Criminology 48(3), pp. 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm073
  53. Pratt J. (2020). Law, Insecurity and Risk Control. Neo-Liberal Governance and the Populist Revolt. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  54. Pratt J. and Miao M. (2019). ‘The end of penal populism: The rise of populist politics.’ Archiwum Kryminologii 44(2), pp. 15–40. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2019M
  55. Pratt J., Brown D., Brown M., Hallsworth S. and Morrison W. (eds.) (2005). The New Punitiveness. Trends, Theories, Perspectives. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
  56. Šelih A. (2012). ‘Crime and crime control in transition countries.’ In A. Šelih and A. Završnik (eds.) Crime and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Springer, pp. 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3517-4_1
  57. Simon J. (2007). Governing Through Crime. How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  58. Snacken S. (2006). ‘A reductionist penal policy and European human rights standards.’ European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 12(2), pp. 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-006-9014-3
  59. Snacken S. (2010). ‘Resisting punitiveness in Europe?.’ Theoretical Criminology 14(3), pp. 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480610370165
  60. Snacken S. and Dumortier E. (2012b). ‘Resisting Punitiveness in Europe? An Introduction.’ In S. Snacken and E. Dumortier (eds.) Resisting Punitiveness in Europe? Welfare, Human Rights, and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–20.
  61. Snacken S. and Dumortier E. (eds.) (2012a). Resisting Punitiveness in Europe? Welfare, Human Rights, and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.
  62. Sozzo M. (2016). ‘Democratization, politics and punishment in Argentina.’ Punishment & Society 18(3), pp. 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516645689
  63. Steenhuis D.W., Tiggers L.C.M., and Essers J.J.A. (1983). ‘Penal climate in the Netherlands. Sunny or cloudy?.’ The British Journal of Criminology 23(1), pp. 1–16.
  64. Super G.J. (2016). ‘Punishment, violence and grassroots democracy in South Africa – The politics of populist punitiveness.’ Punishment & Society 18(3), pp. 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516645685
  65. Tonry M. (2001). ‘Symbol, substance, and severity in western penal policies.’ Punishment & Society 3(4), pp. 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228401
  66. Tonry M. (2007a). ‘Preface.’ In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime, Punishment and Politics in Comparative Perspective. Crime and Justice. A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. VII-IX.
  67. Tonry M. (2007b). ‘Determinant of penal policies.’ Crime and Justice 36, pp. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/518582
  68. Tonry M. (2012). ‘Foreword.’ In S. Snacken and E. Dumortier (eds.) Resisting Punitiveness in Europe? Welfare, Human Rights, and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. XVII–XIX.
  69. Tonry M. (2022). ‘Punishments, politics, and prisons in Western countries’. Crime and Justice 51, pp. 7–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/721278
  70. Tripkovic M. (2016). ‘Beyond punitiveness? Governance of crime and authoritarian heritage in Serbia.’ Punishment & Society 18(3), pp. 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516645684
  71. Whitman J.Q. (2003). Harsh Justice. Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
  72. Wozniakowska-Fajst D. and Witkowska-Rozpara K. (2022). ‘How neoclassical criminology, penal populism and COVID-19 helped to escalate the repressiveness of criminal law – the case of Poland?.’ Archiwum Kryminologii 44(1), pp. 77–106. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2021.27