Make a Submission
No. XLV/1 (2023)
Articles

“The Sámi Exceptionalism”? Sámi People as inmates in Norwegian prisons: Ethnos and penitentiary policy

“The Sámi Exceptionalism”? Sámi People as inmates in Norwegian prisons: Ethnos and penitentiary policy

PDF
  • Katarzyna Witkowska-Rozpara
Katarzyna Witkowska-Rozpara
Uniwersytet Warszawski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.11

Published 2023-12-07

Keywords

  • Sámi People,
  • prison,
  • Norway,
  • punishment,
  • discrimination,
  • indigenous peoples,
  • undoing historical wrongs

How to Cite

Witkowska-Rozpara, K. (2023). “The Sámi Exceptionalism”? Sámi People as inmates in Norwegian prisons: Ethnos and penitentiary policy: “The Sámi Exceptionalism”? Sámi People as inmates in Norwegian prisons: Ethnos and penitentiary policy. Archives of Criminology, (XLV/1), 25–73. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.11
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The Sámi are one of the three indigenous ethnic groups in Scandinavia, and more than half of the Sámi population lives in Norway. The special status of the Sámi in this country, and thus the legal solutions adopted by the Norwegian authorities, is a result of historical conditions, particularly the indigenous nature of this group. Particularly noteworthy are the rights granted to the Sámi in Sameloven – a law from 1987 that introduces the exceptional right of the Sámi to use their language while serving sentences in prison. The aim of this article is to present the rights of the Sami people as they are situated within Norwegian correctional facilities from three perspectives: theoretical, showcasing the key relevant legislative solutions; practical, pointing out violations of the rights of Sámi prisoners and Norway’s attempts to address these violations; and axiological, explaining the origin and philosophy of the special treatment of Sámi inmates in Norway (and, more broadly, of the Sámi People).

PDF

References

  1. Statsborgerskap, alders- og kjønnsfordeling for hele befolkningen 1977–2022 [Population, by sex, age and citizenship 1977–2023] (2023), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/05196 [10.08.2023].
  2. Innsatte, etter type fengsling, alder og kjønn. Per 1. januar. Absolutte tall 2002–2021 [Prison population, by type of imprisonment, age and sex. Per 1 January. Absolute figures 2002–2021] (2022), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10530 [10.08.2023].
  3. Innsatte, etter type fengsling, hovedlovbruddsgruppe, type hovedlovbrudd og alder. Per 1. januar. Absolutte tall 2002–2021 [Prison population, by type of imprisonment, group of principal offence, type of principal offence and age. Per 1 January. Absolute figures 2002–2021] (2022), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10531 [10.08.2023].
  4. Innsatte, etter type fengsling, hovedlovbruddsgruppe og statsborgerskap. Per 1. januar. Absolutte tall 2012–2021 [Prison population, by type of imprisonment, group of principal offence and citizenship. Per 1 January. Absolute figures 2012–2021] (2022), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10533/ [10.08.2023].
  5. Straffereaksjoner (utvalgte), etter type reaksjon, hovedlovbruddsgruppe og type hovedlovbrudd. Absolutte tall 1997–2021 [Penal sanctions (selected), by type of sanction, group of principal offence and type of principal offence. Absolute figures 1997–2021] (2022), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10622/ [31.10.2023].
  6. Straffereaksjoner (utvalgte), etter hovedlovbruddsgruppe og statsborgerskap (og hovedlovbruddskategori –2014). Absolutte tall 2011–2020 [Penal sanctions (selected), by group of principal offence and citizenship (and category of principal offence –2014). Absolute figures 2011–2020] (2022), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10627 [31.10.2023].
  7. Areal og befolkning i kommuner, fylker og hele landet (K) 2007–2022 [Population and area, by region, contents and year] (2022), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/11342 [04.08.2023].
  8. Befolkning, etter kommunestørrelse, alder og kjønn 2017–2023 [Population, by size of municipality, sex and age 2017–2023] (2023), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/12871 [01.08.2023].
  9. About the Norwegian Correctional Service [About the NCS] (b.d.), Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/?cat=536003 [01.08.2023].
  10. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995). Dostęp online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/515/200/ [10.08.2023].
  11. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs [ACHPR, IWIGA] (2005). Report of the African Commission on Human and Peoplesʼ Rights Working Group of Experts on Indigenous Populations/Communities (2005), Iwgia.org. Dostęp online: https://www.iwgia.org/images/publications/African_Commission_book.pdf [10.08.2023].
  12. Befolkning (2023). Statistisk sentralbyrå [Statistics Norway], Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/folketall/statistikk/befolkning [01.08.2023].
  13. Bijoy C.R., Gopalakrishnan S. i Khanna S. (2010). India and the Right of Indigenous Peoples. Constitutional, Legislative and Administrative Provisions Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in India and their Relation to International Law on Indigenous Peoples. Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact. Dostęp online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/C-R-Bijoy/publication/281625880_INDIA_AND_THE_RIGHTS_OF_INDIGENOUS_PEOPLES_Constitutional_Legislative_and_Administrative_Provisions_Concerning_Indigenous_and_Tribal_Peoples_in_India_and_their_Relation_to_International_Law_on_Indigen/links/55f4d9a608ae1d980394c283/INDIA-AND-THE-RIGHTS-OF-INDIGENOUS-PEOPLES-Constitutional-Legislative-and-Administrative-Provisions-Concerning-Indigenous-and-Tribal-Peoples-in-India-and-their-Relation-to-International-Law-on-Indige.pdf [10.08.2023].
  14. Bonusiak G. (2016). Status Saamów w państwach nordyckich w świetle międzynarodowych standardów ochrony praw ludów rdzennych [The status of the Sámi in the Nordic countries in the light of international standards for the protection of the indigenous peoplesʼ rights]. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.
  15. Bossuyt M. (2002). Prevention of Discrimination. Concept and Practice of Affirmative Action. Final Report Submitted by Mr. Marc Bossuyt, Special Rapporteur, in Accordance with Sub-Commission Resolution 1998/5, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2002/21. Dostęp online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/467997/files/E_CN.4_Sub.2_2002_21-EN.pdf?ln=en [10.08.2023].
  16. Broderstad E.A. (2011). ʻThe promises and challenges of indigenous self-determination: The Sami caseʼ. International Journal 66(4), s. 893–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201106600416
  17. Christensen C. (2012). ʻReclaiming the past: On the history-making significance of the Sámi film The Kautokeino Rebellionʼ. Acta Borealia 29(1), s. 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2012.678720
  18. City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989). Dostęp online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/488/469/ [10.08.2023].
  19. Conceição P. (ed.) (2020). Human Development Report 2020. The Next Frontier Human Development and the Anthropocene. United Nations Development Programme. Dostęp online: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents//hdr2020pdf.pdf [10.08.2023].
  20. Conceição P. (ed.) (2022). Human Development Report 2021–2022. Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives Shaping our Future in a Transforming World. United Nations Development Programme. Dostęp online: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2021-22pdf_1.pdf [10.08.2023].
  21. Coyle A. (2006). Revision of the European Prison Rules, a Contextual Report, Rm.coe.int. Dostęp online: https://rm.coe.int/european-prison-rules-978-92-871-5982-3/16806ab9ae [10.08.2023].
  22. Diehtojuohkin sámegillii [Information for Sámi People] (b.d.), Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/?cat=536010 [10.08.2023].
  23. Dubrava C. (2014). ʻExternal citizenship in EU countriesʼ. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37(13), s. 2340–2360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.826812
  24. Eide A. i Daes E.-I. (2000). Working Paper on the Relationship and Distinction Between the Rights of Persons Belonging to Minorities and those of Indigenous Peoples, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/10. Dostęp online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/419546/files/E_CN.4_Sub.2_2000_10-EN.pdf?ln=en [10.08.2023].
  25. Eriksen A. M., Valio K. i Kemi M. E. (2008). Samisk fange vil vekk fra Tromsø fengsel [Sami prisoner wants to leave Tromsø prison], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/tilsynsradet-stotter-samiske-fanger-1.4697453 [10.08.2023].
  26. Fair H. i Walmsley R. (2021). World Prison Population List – thirteenth edition, Prisonstudies.org. Dostęp online: https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/world_prison_population_list_13th_edition.pdf [10.08.2023].
  27. Falch T., Selle P. i Strømsnes K. (2016). ʻThe Sámi: 25 years of indigenous authority in Norwayʼ. Ethnopolitics 15(1), s. 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101846
  28. Føleide A. (2022). Storfylkene kan splittes igjen: – Nå ønsker vi oss forutsigbarhet [Major counties can be re-divided: Now we want predictability], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/tromsogfinnmark/vedtatt-i-stortinget_-storfylkene-skal-splittes-igjen_-na-onsker-de-ansatte-ro-og-forutsigbarhet-1.16001790 [10.08.2023].
  29. Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS] (2022). Stan i struktura ludności według wieku w latach 1989–2020 [Population status and structure by age from 1989 to 2020], Stat.gov.pl. Dostęp online: https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5468/16/1/1/tablica_1.xls [10.08.2023].
  30. Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS] (2023). Polska w liczbach [Poland in numbers], Stat.gov.pl. Dostęp online: https://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5501/14/16/1/polska_w_liczbach_2023_pl_pi.pdf [10.08.2023]
  31. Górnicz-Mulcahy A. (2019). ʻUprawnienia pracownicze pracowników tubylczychʼ [Employment rights of indigenous workers]. W K.W. Baran (red.) Międzynarodowe publiczne prawo pracy. Standardy globalne [International public labor law. Global standards]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, s. 331–334.
  32. Guttorm K.A, Kemi M.E. i Hagen J. (2009). Tromsø fengsel får kritikk [Tromsø Prison has been criticized], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/stotter-samiske-fanger-1.6779632 [10.08.2023].
  33. Hardiman D. (1987). The Coming of the Devi: Adivasi Assertion in Western India. Dehli: Oxford University Press.
  34. Historia til kriminalomsorga [History of the prison service] (b.d.), Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/kriminalomsorgens-historie.582649.no.html [31.10.2023].
  35. Horn K.-S. (2022). Samer fikk kortere straff for fyllekjøring og råkjøring [Saami men were given lenient sentences for careless driving and drunk driving], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/tromsogfinnmark/samer-fikk-kortere-straff-for-fyllekjoring-og-rakjoring-pa-grunn-av-urfolksretten-1.15917403 [10.08.2023].
  36. Imprisonments (2022), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/en/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/kriminalitet-og-rettsvesen/statistikk/fengslinger [10.08.2023].
  37. Jonsen Eira J.E. (2014). Bedre soning for samiske innsatte [More lenient sentences for Saami prisoners], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/bedre-soning-for-samiske-1.11602631 [10.08.2023].
  38. Kailas & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra Tr. Taluka P.S., Crl. A. No.-000011-000011/2011 (2011). Dostęp online: https://legaldata.in/supreme-court/judgments/kailas-v-state-of-maharashtra-tr-taluka-p-s--19525 [10.08.2023].
  39. Kårvåg Sørensen A., Andreassen R.N. i Andersen M. (2021). Jubel i nord etter skilsmissen: Nå skal vi feire! [Joy in the North after divorce: Now we're going to celebrate!], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/tromsogfinnmark/troms-og-finnmark-sin-tvangssammenslaing-er-historie-og-det-jubles-i-nord-1.15688341 [10.08.2023].
  40. Kent N. (2018). The Sámi People of The North. A Social and Cultural History. London: C. Hurst & Co. (Publishers) Ltd.
  41. Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development] (2014). Rapport fra gjennomgang av samelovens språkregler [Report from review of the language rules of the Sami Act) [Språkregler Rapport], Regjeringen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kmd/sami/same/gjennomgang_av_samelovens_sprakregler.pdf [10.08.2023].
  42. Kongeriket Norges Grunnlov [Constitution of the Kingdom of Norway] (1814), Lovdata.no. Dostęp online: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1814-05-17 [10.08.2023].
  43. Konvention mellan Sverige och Norge angående flyttlapparnas rätt till renbetning [Convention between Sweden and Norway on the right of migratory birds to reindeer grazing] (1919), Regeringen.se. Dostęp online: https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/db081cd6b45c438c8b0c79a303dbd257/konvention-mellan-sverige-och-norge-angaende-flyttlapparnas-ratt-till-renbetning.pdf [31.10.2023].
  44. Konwencja Międzynarodowej Organizacji Pracy nr 107 [Konwencja MOP] [International Labor Organization Convention no. 107] (1957), Ilo.org. Dostęp online: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C107 [10.08.2023].
  45. Konwencja Międzynarodowej Organizacji Pracy nr 169 [Konwencja MOP] [International Labor Organization Convention no. 169] (1989), Ilo.org. Dostęp online: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_ILO_CODE:C169 [10.08.2023].
  46. Korsell L. i Larsson P. (2011). ʻOrganized crime the Nordic wayʼ. Crime and Justice 40(1), s. 519–554. https://doi.org/10.1086/660917
  47. Kriminalomsorgen (2021). Årsrapport 2020 [Annual Report 2020], Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/getfile.php/4852079.823.amjubkaqlqkaql/%C3%85rsrapport+2020+-+samlet2.pdf [10.08.2023].
  48. Kriminalomsorgen (2022). Årsrapport 2021 [Annual Report 2021], Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/getfile.php/5011968.823.ljwkp7uzmtwqqb/Kriminalomsorgen+%C3%A5rsrapport+2021+m.+vedlegg.pdf [10.08.2023].
  49. Kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet (2014). Kriminalomsorgens tiltaksplan for god og likeverdig straffegjennomføring for samiske innsatte og domfelte [The Norwegian Directorate of Correctional Services, the Norwegian Correctional Serviceʼs action plan for good and equal execution of sentences for Sami inmates and convicted persons], Kriminalomsorgen.custompublish.com. Dostęp online: http://kriminalomsorgen.custompublish.com/getfile.php/2722430.823.rscxtfrcpb/Tiltaksplan+for+god+og+likeverdig+straffegjennomf%C3%B8ring+for+samiske+innsatte+og+domfelte+(norsk).pdf [10.08.2023].
  50. Kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet (2021). Svar på henvendelse fra Sivilombudsmannen vedrørrende kriminalomsorgens kontroll med innsattes kommunikasjon og ringekostnader [The Norwegian Directorate of Correctional Services, Response to inquiry from the Parliamentary Ombudsman concerning the Correctional Serviceʼs control of prisonersʼ communication and calling costs], Sivilombudet.no. Dostęp online: https://www.sivilombudet.no/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Svar-pa-henvendelse-fra-Sivilombudsmannen-vedrorende-kriminalomsorgens-kontroll-med-innsattes-kommunikasjon-og-ringekostnader-.pdf [01.08.2023].
  51. Kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet [Directorate of the Prison Service] (2023), Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet.535879.no.html [31.10.2023].
  52. Kyllingstad J.R. (2014). Physical Anthropology in Norway 1890–1945. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
  53. Labba E.A. (2023). Panowie nas tu przesiedlili. O przymusowych przesiedleniach w Szwecji [The gentlemen put us here: About the forced relocations in Sweden]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Marginesy.
  54. Lantto P. (2010). ʻBorders, citizenship and change: The case of the Sami people, 1751–2008ʼ. Citizenship Studies 14(5), s. 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2010.506709
  55. Larsson C.-G. (2013). Et språk-Apartheid [Linguistic apartheid], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/forskning-pa-samiske-innsatte-1.10922893 [05.08.2023].
  56. Larsson C.-G. i Sara K.A. (2014). Ikke diskutert eget samisk fengsel [The idea of a separate Saami prison was not discussed], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/ikke-diskutert-eget-samisk-fengsel-1.11912375 [01.08.2023].
  57. Larsson C.-G., Gaup B.S. i Rasmus J. (2013). Norske og samiske innsatte må likestilles [Norwegian and Sami prisoners must be treated equally], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/ikke-likestilling-i-norske-fengsler-1.10927031 [02.08.2023].
  58. Lawrence Ch.R. (1987). ʻThe id, the ego, and equal protection: Reckoning with unconscious racismʼ. Stanford Law Review 39(2), s. 317–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228797
  59. Likestillings- og diskrimineringsombudet [The Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman] (2017). Innsatt og utsatt – Rapport om soningsforholdene til utsatte grupper i fengsel [Prisoners and victims – Report on prison conditions for vulnerable groups in prison], Ldo.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ldo.no/globalassets/brosjyrer-handboker-rapporter/rapporter_analyser/soningsrapport-web.pdf [01.08.2023].
  60. Lov om fengselsvesenet [Prison Service Act] (1958), Lovdata.no. Dostęp online: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLO/lov/1958-12-12-7?q=Lov%20om%20fengselsvesenet [31.10.2023].
  61. Lov om gjennomføring av straff mv. [Act relating to the execution of sentences etc.] (2001), Lovdata.no. Dostęp online: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2001-05-18-21?q=Straffegjennomf%C3%B8ringsloven [31.10.2023].
  62. Lov om reindrift [Reindeer Herding Act] (1976), Lovdata.no. Dostęp online: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLO/lov/1978-06-09-49 [31.10.2023].
  63. Lov om Sametinget og andre samiske rettsforhold [The Act on the Sámi Parliament and other Sámi legal matters] (1987), Lovdata.no. Dostęp online: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1987-06-12-56?q=sameloven [01.08.2023].
  64. Łętowski J. (1987). ʻWspółczesne problemy prawniczych badań porównawczychʼ. Studia Prawnicze 3(93), s. 3–27. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.1987.3.1
  65. Måsø N.H. (2015). Tana Høyre: Norske fengsler duger dårlig for samer [Tana Conservative Party: Norwegian prisons are bad for Sámi People], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/vil-ha-samisk-fengsel-1.12443413 [01.08.2023].
  66. Mathisen S.R. (2004). ʻHegemonic representations of Sámi culture: From narratives of noble savages to discourses on ecological Sámiʼ. W A.-L.Siikala, B.Klein i S.R. Mathisen (red.) Creating Diversities: Folklore, Religion and the Politics of Heritage. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, s. 17–30.
  67. Metro Broadcasting v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990). Dostęp online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/497/547/ [10.08.2023].
  68. Michałowska G. (2006). ʻStatus społeczny ludności tubylczej w Afryce w świetle międzynarodowych standardów ochrony praw człowiekaʼ [The Social status of indigenous peoples in Africa in the light of international human rights standards]. W E. Haliżak (red.) Stosunki międzynarodowe w XXI wieku. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 30-lecia Instytutu Stosunków Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego [International relations in the 21st century. Jubilee book on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Institute of International Relations of the University of Warsaw]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Scholar, s. 755–778.
  69. Minde H. (2003). ʻAssilimation of the Sami – implementation and consquencesʼ. Acta Borealia 20(2), s. 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08003830310002877
  70. Mjåland K. i Lundeberg I (2014). ʻPenal hybridization: Staff–prisoner relationships in a Norwegian drug rehabilitation unitʼ. W H. Sinding Aasen, S. Gloppen, A.M. Magnussen i E. Nilssen (red.) Juridification and Social Citizenship in the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar Publishing, s. 183–202. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470235.00015
  71. Mogård L.E. i Garfjeld M. (2020). I dag søker Troms og Finnmark om «skilsmisse» [The municipalities of Troms and Finnmark are now appealing for “divorce”], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/tromsogfinnmark/i-dag-soker-troms-og-finnmark-om-_skilsmisse_-1.15064234 [01.08.2023].
  72. Naidu M.V. (1995). ʻCanadian multiculturalism: A discussionʼ. Peace Research 27(2), s. 1–22.
  73. Observations on the State of Indigenous Human Rights in India Prepared for United Nations Human Rights Council: March 2022 4th Cycle of Universal Periodic Review of India 41st Session of the Human Rights Council (2022), Uprdoc.ohchr.org. Dostęp online: https://uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/downloadfile.aspx?filename=10048&file=EnglishTranslation [10.08.2023].
  74. Observations on the State of Indigenous Human Rights in India Prepared for: The United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review 2016 27th Session Third Cycle (2016), Uprdoc.ohchr.org. Dostęp online: ,https://uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/downloadfile.aspx?filename=3909&file=EnglishTranslation [10.08.2023].
  75. Om kriminalomsorgen [About the Norwegian Correctional Service] (b.d.), Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/om-kriminalomsorgen.237840.no.html [01.08.2023].
  76. Om Sametinget [About the Sami Parliament] (b.d.), Sametinget.no. Dostęp online: https://sametinget.no/om-sametinget/om-sametinget/ [01.08.2023].
  77. Parmar P. (2012). ʻUndoing historical wrongs: Law and indigeneity in Indiaʼ. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 49(3), s. 491–525. https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1045
  78. Płatek M. (2007). Systemy penitencjarne państw skandynawskich: na tle polityki kryminalnej, karnej i penitencjarnej [Penitentiary systems of the Scandinavian countries: In the light of criminal, penal and penitentiary policies]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  79. Polska w liczbach [Poland in numbers] (b.d.), Gov.pl. Dostęp online: https://www.gov.pl/web/gdos/polska-w-liczbach [10.08.2023].
  80. Pratt J. (2008a). ʻScandinavian exceptionalism in an area of penal excess. Part. Iʼ. British Journal of Criminology 48(2), s. 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm072
  81. Pratt J. (2008b). ʻScandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part II: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future?ʼ British Journal of Criminology 48(3), s. 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm073
  82. Ramdas R.S. (2009). ʻWomen, forestspaces and the law: Transgressing the boundariesʼ. Economic and Political Weekly 44(44), s. 65–73.
  83. Ravna O. (2014). ʻThe fulfilment of Norwayʼs International Legal Obligations to the Sámi – assessed by the protection of rights to lands, waters and natural resourcesʼ. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 21(3), s. 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02103001
  84. Ravna O. (2020). ʻThe duty to consult the Sámi in Norwegian lawʼ. Arctic Review on Laws and Politics 11, s. 233–255. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2582
  85. Ravna O. (2021). ʻNorwegian courts and Sámi lawʼ. Arctic Review on Laws and Politics 12, s. 179–185. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v12.3417
  86. Recommendation Rec(2006)2-rev of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the European Prison Rules (2006), Rm.coe.int. Dostęp online: https://rm.coe.int/09000016809ee581 [10.08.2023].
  87. Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978). Dostęp online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/438/265/ [10.08.2023].
  88. Rio K.M. (2022). Forsker på arktiske urfolks fremstilling av seg selv [Researching Arctic indigenous peoplesʼ portrayal of themselves], Uib.no. Dostęp online: https://www.uib.no/voa/153398/forsker-p%C3%A5-arktiske-urfolks-fremstilling-av-seg-selv [01.08.2023].
  89. Rolfsen N., Werenskiold E., Kiær A.N., Getz B. i Brøgger W.L. (red.) (1902). Norge i det nittende Aarhundrede – v. 2 [Norway in the 19th century – v. 2]. Kristiania: Cammermeyer.
  90. Saamelaiset Suomessa [Sami People in Finland] (2023), Samediggi.fi. Dostęp online: https://www.samediggi.fi/saamelaiset-info/ [14.10.2023].
  91. Samisk fengsel [Sami Prison] (2004), Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/kultur/samisk-fengsel-1.894983 [01.08.2023].
  92. Samisk mat og kultur i Tromsø fengsel [Sami food and culture in Tromsø prison] (2022), Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/samisk-mat-og-kultur-i-tromsoe-fengsel.6505551-516313.html [01.08.2023].
  93. Sannhet og forsoning – grunnlag for et oppgjør med fornorskingspolitikk og urett mot samer, kvener/norskfinner og skogfinner [Report of the truth and Reconciliation Commission to Investigate the Norwegianisation Policy and Injustice against the Sámi and Kvens/Norwegian Finns] (2023), Stortinget.no. https://www.stortinget.no/globalassets/pdf/sannhets--og-forsoningskommisjonen/rapport-til-stortinget-fra-sannhets--og-forsoningskommisjonen.pdf [12.08.2023].
  94. Semb A.J. (2001). ʻHow norms affect policy – the case of Sami policy in Norway.ʼ International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 8(2–3), s. 177–222. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718110120908394
  95. Sivilombudet (2009). Oppfølging av besøk i Tromsø fengsel [Continuation of the visit to Tromsø Prison], Sivilombudet.no. Dostęp online: https://www.sivilombudet.no/kap-v-referat-av-saker-nb/59-oppfolging-av-besok-i-tromso-fengsel-2/ [01.08.2023].
  96. Sivilombudsman (2019). Special Report to the Storting on Solitary Confinement and Lack of Human Contact in Norwegian Prisons (2018–2019), Sivilombudet.no. Dostęp online: https://www.sivilombudet.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SOM_S%C3%A6rskilt-melding_ENG_WEB.pdf [01.08.2023].
  97. Spann G.A. (1995). ʻAffirmative action and discriminationʼ. Howard Law Journal 39(1). Dostęp online: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1929 [10.08.2023].
  98. Standard for lovbruddstyper [Classification of type of offence] (2023), Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/klass/klassifikasjoner/146/ [31.10.2023].
  99. Statistisk sentralbyrå (b.d.). Penal sanctions and sanctioned persons, by type of sanction, Ssb.no. Dostęp online: https://www.ssb.no/en/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/kriminalitet-og-rettsvesen/statistikk/straffereaksjoner [31.10.2023].
  100. Stein J., Saghaug Broderstad T. i Bjørnå H. (2022). ʻTerritorial reforms, mobilisation, and political trust: A case study from Norwayʼ. Local Government Studies 49(3), s. 568–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.2025360
  101. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellow of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina [Students v. President and Fellow of Harvard College] (2023). Dostęp online: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf [13.08.2023].
  102. Supernat J. (2018). ʻZ zagadnień komparatystyki prawniczejʼ [Legal comaratistics. Selected issues]. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Przegląd Prawa i Administracji 14, s. 219–234. https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1134.114.14
  103. Szpak A. (2018). Bezpieczeństwo ludzkie ludów tubylczych w Arktyce na przykładzie Samów. Wybrane zagadnienia [Human security of the indigenous peoples in the Arctic on the example of the Sámi. Selected issues]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
  104. The Constitution of India (2022), Cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in. Dostęp online: https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s380537a945c7aaa788ccfcdf1b99b5d8f/uploads/2023/05/2023050195.pdf [10.08.2023].
  105. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2019). Rural Policy Reviews Linking the Indigenous Sami People with Regional Development in Sweden, Oecd-ilibrary.org. Dostęp online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/linking-the-indigenous-sami-people-with-regional-development-in-sweden_9789264310544-en [16.10.2023].
  106. The Parliamentary Ombudsman’s Annual Report for 2019 as National Preventive Mechanism against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Submitted to the Storting on 24 March 2020 [Ombudsman’s Report] (2020), Sivilombudet.no. Dostęp online: https://www.sivilombudet.no/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/FOREBENH_%C3%85RSMELDING_2019_ENG_WEB.pdf [10.08.2023].
  107. Tre gipsavstøpninger av samiske fanger fra Akershus festning 1852–1853 [Three plaster casts of Sami prisoners from Akershus Fortress 1852–1853] (b.d.), Samisksamling.w.uib.no. Dostęp online: https://samisksamling.w.uib.no/gipsavstopninger/ [04.08.2023].
  108. Type fengsel og soningsformer [Types of prisons and forms of imprisonment] (b.d.), Kriminalomsorgen.no. Dostęp online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/type-fengsel-og-sikkerhetsnivaa.516316.no.html [31.10.2023].
  109. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples [UN Declaration RIP] (2007). Press Release “Historic Milestone for Indigenous Peoples Worldwide as UN Adopts Rights Declaration”, Un.org. Dostęp online: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/Declaration_ip_pressrelease.pdf [10.08.2023].
  110. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples [UN Declaration 61/295] (2007). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 13 September 2007, A/RES/61/295, Un.org. Dostęp online: http://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf [10.08.2023].
  111. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division [UN DESA] (2022). World Population Prospects 2022, Summary of Results, Un.org. Dostęp online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf [12.08.2023].
  112. United Nations Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UN Population Division DESA] (2022a). World Population Prospects 2022 – File GEN/01/REV1: Demographic Indicators by Region, Subregion and Country, Annually for 1950–2100 (2022a), Population.un.org. Dostęp online: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Files/1_Indicators%20(Standard)/EXCEL_FILES/1_General/WPP2022_GEN_F01_DEMOGRAPHIC_INDICATORS_REV1.xlsx [10.08.2023].
  113. United Nations Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UN Population Division DESA] (2022b). Life Expectancy at Birth, both Sexes (Years) / Demographic Indicators by Region, Subregion and Country, Annually for 1950–2100 (2022), Population.un.org. Dostęp online: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/MostUsed/ [10.08.2023].
  114. UNODC (2015). The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules), Unodc.org. Dostęp online: https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Nelson_Mandela_Rules-E-ebook.pdf [10.08.2023].
  115. Utlendingsdirektoratet [UDI] (2023). Registrerte søknader om beskyttelse fra ukrainske borgere i 2022–2023 [Registered applications for protection from Ukrainian citizens in 2022–2023], Udi.no. Dostęp online: https://www.udi.no/statistikk-og-analyse/statistikk/asylsokere-fra-ukraina-i-2022/ [13.08.2023].
  116. Valkonen S., Aikio A., Alakorva S., i Magga S.-M. (2022). The Sámi World. London: Routledge.
  117. Vašák K. (1977). ʻA 30-year struggle: The sustained efforts to give force of law to the universal Declaration of Human Rightsʼ. UNESCO Courier 30(11), s. 28–29. Dostęp online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000048063
  118. Vollebæk K. i Plesner I.Th. (2014). ʻConstitutional protection of national minorities’ rights in Norway: Does it matter?ʼ. Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32(2), s. 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2014.897800
  119. Vuolab S.E. (2010). Sender ansatte på samiskkurs [Sending employees on courses concerning The Sámi People], Nrk.no. Dostęp online: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/fengselsbetjenter-pa-samiskkurs-1.7042432 [10.08.2023].
  120. Weum J., Botheim I. i Berg S. (2017). Evaluering av kriminalomsorgens organisering [Evaluation of the organisation of the correctional services], Dfo.no. Dostęp online: https://dfo.no/sites/default/files/fagomr%C3%A5der/Rapporter/2017/00-Difi_rapport_2017_8_Evaluering-av-krimomsorgens-organisering.pdf [06.11.2023].
  121. Witkowska-Rozpara K. (2021). ʻWolność kontrolowana po norwesku. Uwagi na tle norweskich rozwiązań normatywnych dotyczących warunkowego zawieszenia wykonania kary i praktyki orzeczniczej sądówʼ [Controlled freedom in Norwegian. Remarks on the Norwegian normative solutions concerning the conditional suspension of the execution of a sentence and the judicial practice of the courts]. W M. Kowalczyk i D. Mackojć (red.) Karanie, terapia, resocjalizacja. W poszukiwaniu najlepszych rozwiązań [Punishment, therapy, resocialization. In search of the best solutions]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, s. 179–206.
  122. Yasar R., Bergmann F., Lloyd-Smith A., Schmid S.-P., Holzinger K. i Kupisch T. (2023). ʻExperience of discrimination in egalitarian societies: the Sámi and majority populations in Sweden and Norwayʼ. Ethnic and Racial Studies. https://doi.org./10.1080/01419870.2023.2243313