Make a Submission
No. XXXVII (2015)
Articles

Experiencing Aggression among Policemen and Their Patterns of Emotional Reactions to Cruelty

PDF (Język Polski)
  • Lucyna Kirwil
Lucyna Kirwil
SWPS University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2015D

Published 2015-01-01

Keywords

  • aggression,
  • reactions to cruelty,
  • Police

How to Cite

Kirwil, L. (2015). Experiencing Aggression among Policemen and Their Patterns of Emotional Reactions to Cruelty. Archives of Criminology, (XXXVII), 101–158. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2015D
Copyright Notice
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The aim of the study was to establish whether police officers, i.e. individuals who experience a lot of aggression from other people, react emotionally to aggressive stimuli differently than students, i.e. individuals that would not have such an experience. The introduction presents a review of contemporary theories of aggression that explain the mechanisms of responses to aggressive stimuli and provocation to aggression. The main hypotheses to be studied were based on the theory of emotional desensitisation. According to this theory, those who have been more exposed in their life to aggression and have experienced aggression react less emotionally to aggressive stimuli, including scenes of cruelty. Thus the police officers should respond with weaker emotional responses to the observed cruelty than the students. Secondly, it was hypothesised that a richer experience with aggression in the past is related to a lower emotional arousal, feeling weaker negative emotions (anxiety, fear, sadness, disgust and anger), less negative evaluations of cruelty, and lower cruelty disapproval. The 134 police officers (aged 24-49 years) exposed to aggression and 125 students (aged 21-32 years) from medical studies and the humanities were examined individually. The questionnaires in use were: STAXI to measure anxiety-traits, BPAQ to measure aggression-traits, anger-traits and hostility, NOBAGGS to measure normative beliefs about aggression, an adapted questionnaire about serious physical aggression, the adapted proactive/reactive aggression scale, and the modified “scale of exposure to violence and violence use by police on the job” by Kowalczyk. The subjects’ reactivity level and emotional arousal in response to the viewed scenes of cruelty were measured by UFI 2071 (to measure skin conductance levels) and self-evaluations at the 7-point rating scales. The subjects marked the levels they felt positive and negative emotions (amusement, joy, relief, anxiety, fear, sadness, anger, and disgust) while watching scenes of cruelty and their evaluations of the observed cruelty (violent, unpleasant, liked, and justified) on a 7-point rating scale. Short excerpts from movies depicting acts of beatings, torture, or murder served as the scenes of cruelty (aggressive stimuli). The research showed that: (1) the policemen were generally less prone to aggression, but they had more experiences with it than the students; (2) the policemen’s emotional reactions to observed cruelty were weaker and less negative than the students’ ones (lower emotional arousal, weaker anxiety, fear, sadness and disgust); (3) the policemen and students did not vary on their evaluations of brutality and justification for cruelty in the observed scenes; their evaluations are negative; (4) a richer experience with aggression is related to a lower emotional response to cruelty (a lower emotional arousal, weaker emotions of anxiety and fear and fewer negative assessments of cruelty, i.e. its brutality and disapproval in both groups examined); (5) the aggression experienced by police officers at work is related to less emotional resistance to the scenes of cruelty: the policemen respond with stronger fear that victimises them and may contribute to the development of trauma; (6) a richer experience of coercive measures at work are related to a weaker emotional response to the observed cruelty (a lower emotional arousal, weaker negative emotions and less negative evaluations of the observed cruelty). The hypotheses formulated on the basis of the theory of desensitisation that the emotional responses of police officers to observed cruelty are dependent on previous experience with aggression, has been confirmed by the findings of the study. The police officer’s emotional reactions to cruelty are weaker as compared to the students’ responses. The results are discussed from the point of view of work demands and the importance of efficiency in police work. The factor lowering the policemen’s emotional resistance to cruelty is their experience of victimisation with aggression. The factor increasing their emotional resistance to cruelty is prior experience of the use of aggression, i.e. situations in which they had the opportunity to use coercive measures reasonably and without the negative influence of increased emotional arousal.

PDF (Język Polski)

References

  1. Anderson C., Effects of violent movies and trait irritability on hostile feelings and aggressive thoughts, „Aggressive Behavior” 1997, t. 23, 161-178.
  2. Anderson C.A., Bushman B.J., Human aggression, „Annual Review of Psychology” 2002, t. 53.
  3. Anderson C.A., Carnagey N.L., Zło brutalne a ogólny model agresji [w:] A.G. Miller (red.), Dobro i zło z perspektywy psychologii społecznej, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2008.
  4. Anderson C.A., Huesmann L.R., Human aggression. A social-cognitive view [w:] M.A. Hogg, J. Cooper (red.), The Sage handbook of social psychology, Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks 2003.
  5. Bandura A., Teoria społecznego uczenia się, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2007.
  6. Barash D.P., Understanding violence. Alyn & Bacon, Boston 2001.
  7. Berkowitz L., Affective aggression. The role of stress, pain and negative affect [w:] R.G. Geen, E. Donnerstein (red.), Human aggression. Theories, research, and implications for social policy, Academic Press, San Diego 1998.
  8. Berkowitz L., Aggression. Its causes, consequences, and control, McGraw Hill, Boston 1993.
  9. Berkowitz L., Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation, „Psychological Bulletin” 1989, t. 106, s. 59-73.
  10. Berkowitz L., On the consideration of automatic as well as controlled psychological processes in aggression, „Aggressive Behavior” 2008, t. 34, nr 2, s. 117-129.
  11. Berkowitz L., On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression. A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis, „American Psychologist” 1990, t. 45, s. 494-503.
  12. Berkowitz L., Psychology of aggression in adulthood [w:] N.J. Smelser, J. Wright, P.B. Baltes (red.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford 2004.
  13. Bushman B.J., Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger and aggressive responding, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin” 2002, t. 28, doi: 10.1177/0146167202289002 [dostęp: 5. 04.2015].
  14. Bushman B.J., Huesmann L.R., Aggression [w:] S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (red.), Handbook of social psychology, John Wiley & Sons, New York 2010.
  15. Buss A.H., Perry M., The Aggression Questionnaire, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology“ 1992, t. 63, s. 452-459.
  16. Carlson H., Thayer R.E., Germann A.C., Social attitudes and personality differences among members of two kinds of police departments (innovative vs. traditional) and students, „The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science” 1971, t. 62, nr 4, s. 564-567.
  17. Crick N.R., Dodge K.A., Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression, „Child Development” 1996, t. 67, nr 3, s. 993-1002.
  18. Dodge K.A., Coie J.D., Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups, „Journal of Personality & Social Psychology” 1987, t. 53, nr 6, s. 1146-1158.
  19. Dollard J., Doob L., Miller N.E., Mowrer O.H., Sears R.R., Frustration and aggression, Yale University Press, New Haven 1939.
  20. Euwema M.C., Kop N., Bakker A.B., The behaviour of Police officers in conflict situations. How burnout and reduced dominance contribute to Belter outcomes, „Work and Stress” 2004, t. 18, nr 1, s. 23-38.
  21. Feshbach S., The function of aggression and regulation of aggressive drive, „Psychological Review” 1964, t. 71, s. 257-272.
  22. Frączek A., O naturze i formowaniu się psychologicznej regulacji agresji interpersonalnej [w:] I. Kurcz, D. Kądzielawa (red.), Psychologia czynności, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa 2002.
  23. Geen R.G., Human aggression, Open University, Philadelphia 2001.
  24. Huesmann L.R, Guerra N.G., Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behaviour, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 1997, t. 72, s. 408-419.
  25. Huesmann L.R., An information processing model for the development of aggression, „Aggressive Behavior” 1988, t. 14, s. 13-24.
  26. Huesmann L.R., Eron L.D., Lefkowitz M.M., Walder L.O., The stability of aggression over time and generations, „Developmental Psychology” 1984, t. 20, s. 1120-1134.
  27. Huesmann L.R., The role of social information processing and cognitive schemas in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior [w:] R.G. Geen, E. Donnerstein (red.), Human aggression. Theories, research, and implications for Policy, Academic Press, New York 1998.
  28. Jaworowska A., Matczak A., APIS-P, STAI RISB. Standaryzacja dla żołnierzy zasadniczej służby wojskowej, PTP, Warszawa 1988.
  29. Kempes M., Matthys W., Vries H. de, Engeland H. van, Reactive and proactive aggression in children – a review of theory, findings and the relevance for child and adolescent psychiatry, „European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry” 2005, t. 14, s. 11-19.
  30. Kirwil L., Agresja – zachowanie chłopców i przekonania normatywne rodziców, „Kolokwia Psychologiczne” 2006, nr 15.
  31. Kirwil L., Agresja interpersonalna – efekt prowokacji czy nastawienia na zdobywanie? [w:] K. Skarżyńska (red.), Między ludźmi… oczekiwania, interesy, emocje, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa 2012.
  32. Kirwil L., Polska adaptacja skali NOBAGGs L. R. Huesmanna i N. Guerry. Maszynopis niepublikowany. Projekt KBN: 2 H01F 057 22). ISS UW, Warszawa 2002.
  33. Klukkert A., Ohlemacher T., Torn between two targets. German police officers talk about the use of force, „Crime Law and Social Change” 2008, t. 52.
  34. Kowalczyk A., Agresja osób wykonujących zawód policjanta – determinanty zachowania. Nieopublikowana praca magisterska. Instytut Profilaktyki Społecznej i Resocjalizacji, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa 2001.
  35. Krahe B., Agresja, GWP, Gdańsk 2006.
  36. Leonard R., Alison L., Critical incidents stress debriefing and its effects on coping strategies and anger in a sample of Australian police officers involved in shooting incidents, „Work & Stress” 1999, t. 13, nr 2, s. 144-161.
  37. Lykken D.T., Venables P.H., Direct measurement of skin conductance: a proposal for standardization, „Psychophysiology” 1971, t. 8, nr 5, s. 656-672.
  38. Moise-Titus J., The role of negative emotions in the media violence-aggression relation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1999.
  39. Papazoglou K., Conceptualizing police complex spiral trauma and its applications in the police field, „Traumatology” 2012, t. 19, nr 3.
  40. Pedersen W.C., Bushman B.J., Vasquez E., Miller N., Kicking the (barking) dog effect. The moderating role of target attributes on triggered displaced aggression, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin” 2008, t. 34, nr 10, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321268 [dostęp: 5.04.2015].
  41. Pulkkinen L., Proactive and reactive aggression in early adolescence as precursors to anti- and prosocial behavior in young adults, „Aggressive Behavior” 1996, t. 22, nr 4, s. 241-257.
  42. Raine A., Dodge K., Loeber R., Gatzke-Kopp L., Lynam D., Reynolds C., Stouthamer-Loeber M., Liu J., The Reactive – Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys, „Aggressive Behavior” 2006, t. 32, nr 2, s. 159-171.
  43. Raine A., Liu J-H., Biological predispositions to violence and their implications forbiosocial treatment and prevention, „Psychology, Crime and Law” 1998, t. 4, nr 2, s. 107-125.
  44. Ramirez J.M., Some dychotomous classifications of aggression according to its function, „Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change” 2009, t. 6, s. 85-101, https://doi.org/10.1386/jots.6.2.85_1 [dostęp: 1.02.2012].
  45. Sollund R., Tough Cop-soft cop? The impact of motivations and experiences on police officers’ approaches to the public, „Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention” 2008, t. 9, nr 2, s. 119-140.
  46. Spielberger C.D., How-I-Feel Questionnaire: STAIC Form C-2. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto 1970.
  47. Vitaro F., Brendgen M., Proactive and reactive aggression. A developmental perspective [w:] R.E. Tremblay, W.W. Hartup, J. Archer (red.), Developmental origins of aggression, The Guilford Press, New York-London 2005.
  48. Vrij A., Steen J. van der, Koppelaar L., Aggression of police officers as a function of temperature. An experiment with fire arms training system, „Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology” 1994, t. 4, nr 5, s. 365-370.
  49. Wojciszke B., Psychologia społeczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa 2011.
  50. Zillmann D., Cognition-excitation dependencies in the escalation of anger and angry aggression [w:] M. Potegal, J.F. Knutson (red.), The dynamics of aggression, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale 1994.
  51. Zillmann D., Hostility and aggression, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale 1979.