No. VIII-IX (1982)
Articles

The Progress of Dependence and Changes in the Social Behavior of Young Adult Drug Addicts

Published 1982-10-01

Keywords

  • addiction,
  • youth toxicomania,
  • narcotic drugs,
  • social dependence,
  • psychological dependence,
  • juvenile,
  • physical dependence,
  • personality changes

How to Cite

Zakrzewski, P. (1982). The Progress of Dependence and Changes in the Social Behavior of Young Adult Drug Addicts. Archives of Criminology, (VIII-IX), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK1982I

Abstract

In the present study the changes in behavior of young adult drug addicts are described, which occurred as their dependence has developed since the beginning of taking drugs. We regard as scientifically fruitless frequent general statements concerning young adult (as well as adult) drug addicts irrespective of their age and the stage of dependence.

The research on which the present study is based was a part of multidisciplinary studies of young adult drug addicts which were conducted by the Department of Mental Health of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Łódź in the years 1974-76. It concerned all patients aged 15-23 registered in the out-patient clinics for young drug addicts and in district out-patient clinics for adults in the city of Łódź because of the repeated taking of narcotic drugs. It is important to note that the discussed population consisted of 102 young adults, of which 23% were girls.

Three detailed interviews were carried on in relation to each case: one with the mother of the given boy or girl (in exceptional cases with another adult member of the family), the second one at school with the tutor and the teachers, and the third one with the drug addict himself . The questionnaires on which the interviews were based took into account, to a high degree, the family conditions of the addicts, their behavior at home , from their earliest childhood up to the latest months, their school history, ways of spending their leisure time, the outset and circumstances of taking drugs, the use of alcohol, the peer groups, living problems in the period preceding the taking of drugs and in subsequent years, delinquency etc. Data were also collected concerning the criminal records of the addicts and the history of various diseases treated in different out-patient clinics. The study was conducted by a team of several persons working under supervision of the author of the present paper.

Estimation of the degree of dependence was based on medical diagnosis. Among the addicts, the following three stages of dependence were distinguished: the stage of social dependence, that of mental dependence and the stage of physical dependence. The greatest part (50%) of the addicts were in the stage of mental dependence.

The addicts were noticed to move to the more advanced stages of dependence in course of time. The mean duration of the period of taking drugs was: with young adults socially dependent 5 months, with those mentally dependent 1 year 5 months, and with those physically dependent 2 years 8 months. There are, however, limitations to this regularity. Some individuals withdrew from talking drugs within the first 12 months of social dependence. Others reached the stage of mental dependence very rapidly, so to say cutting down or even skipping the first stage of dependence. There were also those who remained for a long time in the preliminary stage of the illness, that is, that of mental dependence, revealing no symptoms of physical dependence even after
one or two years. It is thus apparent that the progress of dependence and its rapidity are not the derivative of the length of the period of taking drugs only. An important role is also played by the intensity of taking drugs, by their peculiarities and by the individual immunity of the central nervous system of a given person.

The notion of the so-called social dependence is controversial to a certain degree and as such used only by some of the authors. However, the results of the present study speak in its favor as the term defining the first, and so to say preliminary stage of dependence, preceding the next stages of dependence in the medical sense. In the present study the notion of social dependence is of a very broad range, i.e., its criteria are not limited to the pressure of the peer  group and the boy’s or girl’s eagerness to adjust themselves to this group. On the basis of the collected material, we included in the notion social dependence also the cases in which the addicts communicated with loose society circles, e.g. in cafés, which was accompanied by the predominant trend to adjust themselves to the fashion and customs of such circles, as well as the cases of an influence of individual persons of different sex attracted to each other. The notion of social dependence is worthy of separation, particularly, as the patterns of taking drugs have now become generally accepted among the youth.

Taking certain drugs several times, or even once, caused a considerable improvement of mood of the individuals inclined to experience conflicts intensely, who had a low tolerance to frustration and a poor ability to overcome obstacles, if they only happened upon the drug which changed their mental stale favourably from their point of view. Phenmetrazine was good for some of the persons examined to suppress their mental inhibitions, while others used sedatives to suppress states of tension and excitement, still others - morphine and its derivatives to experience something new and to get away from the dullness of the everyday life. The process of social dependence turning into mental dependence among the addicts consisted in the fact that - as they were experimenting with various drugs in the company of others - they soon found that not only the interpersonal ties were hereby fortified, but also their
hitherto only poorly tolerated mental state could undergo a favorable change. As this belief grew stronger and proved true in all next instances of taking the drug, they experienced the more and more intense desire to take such drugs whenever the state of tension, discouragement or irritation had reached a considerable degree of intensity. However, after some time the hitherto felt desires were dominated by additional and extremely trying sensations of not only mental but also physical nature which occurred in the periods of the break in drug taking. The addicts tried at any price to get rid of withdrawal symptoms. Most frequent were the complaints about the sensation of irritation, restlessness, inability to concentrate on anything, lack of energy, anxiety, insomnia or nightmares, headache and melalgia, hand tremor and other annoying and exhausting symptoms. The examined persons with these
symptoms had already found themselves in the stage of physical dependence.

In the diversity and variability of drugs taken by the addicts as their dependence developed, a following essential regularity could be noticed: the comparatively greatest diversity of drugs taken was usually found at the stage of social dependence. In that of mental dependence, morphine and the specimens approximal to it more and more prevailed among the drugs taken by a given individual, thus reducing the role of other drugs. The transition to physical dependence meant further concentration on the opiates (mainly morphine), while other drugs – including alcohol- became substitutes and were taken when the individual did not possess the favorite drug and thus felt  withdrawal symptoms. The danger of conversion to morphine and other opiates, with all its consequences, thus grew as the taking of drugs continued. It is a matter of course that, as the individual gradually needed drugs more and more difficult to obtain (that, is, those from the morphine group), which were sold at a higher price, and as he needed more and more of the drug and found it more and more difficult to do without - the ways of obtaining it had to change. A phenomenon occurs which can be called escalation not only of the drugs taken, but also of the means of obtaining them. The means in question become more and more ruthless, one counts less and less both with one’s own hitherto existing line of conduct and ambitions and with the probable reactions of the environment. The means of obtaining drugs grow also more and more absorbing, they engage more and more time and efforts.

Simultaneously followed the process of diminution of individual interests and of the disappearance of ambitions in the addicts. It was more and more difficult for them to acquit themselves of the hitherto performed social roles. And thus, for instance, within the range of the role of a pupil, the following symptoms could be found among the addicts beginning from the stage of mental dependence: considerable difficulties of concentration, the slowing down of the run of thought, passiveness and drowsiness during the classes, increasing absence from school, being far away with thought even if physically present at school, regular remiss in doing homework, indifference to school failures, reluctance to undertake efforts to overcome them - that is, greater and
greater slackness in the school duties.

School, usually quitted in the advanced stages of dependence, gave place to irregular and chance periods of working, which did not in the least lead to any professional promotion of a given individual.

All the hitherto existing forms of activity which satisfied their former interests and life plans were - as the dependence developed - replaced by the efforts to obtain every now and again new doses of the longed-for drug. Parallel to this process new specific elements appeared in the life of the addicts: contacts with out-patient clinics, stays in detoxication centres and mental hospitals, which repeated from time to time, and in a considerable number of the cases – court appearances ending more than once with imprisonment.

In general, it must be stated that the progress of dependence has led to intense degradation changes in the lives of the addicts. The whole of those changes were composed of the following: increasing problems and failure at school, quitting school, aggravating conflicts at home, participation in youth groups and circles out of control which were characterized by socially negative patterns of behavior, giving up one’s professional ambitions, staying for months in hospitals, undergoing detoxication treatment, gradual limitation of one’s aims and interests to obtaining and taking drugs, court appearances every now and again.

References

  1. Batawia S., Problematyka toksykomanii I narkomanii u młodzieży, „Państwo i Prawo” 1975, nr 3.
  2. Benos J., Das Verhältnis junger Drogenabhängiger zu ihren Eltern. Familie und Suchterkrankung, Hoheneck, Hamm 1977.
  3. Chruściel T.L., Zależność lekowa typu morfiny [w:] P. Kubikowski, H. Wardaszko-Łysakowska (red.), Zależności lekowe, Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich, Warszawa 1978.
  4. Cockett R., Drug Abuse and Personality In Young Offenders, London 1971.
  5. Dynamika choroby alkoholowej a zmiany społecznych zachowań alkoholika, „Problemy Alkoholizmu” 1979, nr 6.
  6. Hanauskowie T. i W., Narkomania. Studium kryminologiczno-kryminalistyczne, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, Warszawa 1976.
  7. Jakubczyk A., Psychologiczne i społeczne uwarunkowania zależności lekowych [w:] P. Kubikowski, H. Wardaszko-Łysakowska (red.), Zależności lekowe, Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich, Warszawa 1978.
  8. Jędrzejczak W., Jędrzejczak M., Szakowski A., Próba oceny osobowości i warunków społecznych toksykomanów, „Zdrowie Psychiczne” 1973, nr 3.
  9. Jong R. de, Vorschläge zu einem umfassenden Verhaltenstherapieansatz bei jugendlichen Drogenbhägigen [w:] R. Ferstl, S. Kraemer, Abhägigkeiten, Urban & Schwarzenberg, München 1976.
  10. Jucha Z., Poseł Z., Tomczak J. W., Zakrzewski P., Badania nad toksykomanią wśród młodzieży (problematyka i metodyka), „Zdrowie Psychiczne” 1976, nr 1.
  11. Jucha Z., Tomczak J. W., Poseł Z., Rendecka A., Osobowościowe korelaty zachowania się młodzieży z rozpoznaniem uzależnienia lekowego, „Zdrowie Psychiczne” 1976, nr 4.
  12. Juśko-Walecka W., Sandowska T., Stomma D., Welbel L., Charakterystyka pacjentów warszawskich poradni zdrowia psychicznego dla dzieci i młodzieży zgłoszonych z powodu używania środków chemicznych w celach nieleczniczych, „Psychiatria Polska” 1974, nr 4.
  13. Kandel D., Interpersonal Influences on Adolescent Illegal Drug Use [w:] E. Josephson, Drug Use – Epidemiological and Sociological Approaches, Halsted Press, New York, 1974.
  14. Kielholz P., Ladewig L., Die Drogenabhängigkeit des modernen Menschen, Lehmann, München 1972.
  15. Kolbowski J., Rola grupy rówieśniczej w etiologii toksykomanii, „Patologia Społeczna – Zapobieganie” 1976, t. 2.
  16. Kulisiewicz T., Rozpoznawanie wczesnych okresów alkoholizmu, „Problemy Alkoholizmu” 1972, nr 12.
  17. Lawson R., Winsstead D.K., Toward a Theory of Drug Use, „British Journal of Addiction” 1978, nr 2.
  18. Löschenkohl E., Jugendliche und Rauschmittel, Bundesverlag für Unterricht, Wien 1971.
  19. Piotrowski A., Niektóre psychospołeczne determinanty przyjmowania przez młodzież środków odurzających w latach 1969-1973 [w:] M. Jarosz (red.) Wybrane zagadnienia patologii rodziny, GUS, Warszawa 1976.
  20. Plant M.A., Drugtaking and Prevention – The Implications of Research for Social Policy, „British Journal of Addiction” 1980, nr 3.
  21. Poseł Z., Tomczak J.W., Cechy okresu adolescencji jako czynniki predyspozycyjne do zażywania środków uzależniających [w:] T. Marcinkowski (red.), Toksykomanie i nawyk alkoholizowania się wśród młodzieży oraz inne zagadnienia sądowo-lekarskie, WSO, Szczecin 1977.
  22. Poseł Z., Tomczak J.W., Kliniczna ocean zażywania środków uzależniających przez młodzież, „Psychiatria Polska – w druku.
  23. Poseł Z., Tomczak J.W., Leczenie stanów depresyjnych i jego rola w pierwotnej profilaktyce uzależnień lekowych u młodzieży, „Psychiatria Polska” 1979, nr 6.
  24. Przybylak H., Przylipiak C., Problem toksykomanii i narkomanii w świetle spostrzeżeń szpitala psychiatrycznego „Srebrzysko” w Gdańsku, „Zdrowie Psychiczne” 1973, nr 3.
  25. Rippere V., „Drug Addiction and „Drug Dependence” – A Note on Word Meanings, „British Journal of Addiction” 1978, nr 4.
  26. Rydzyński Z., Woyczyńska M., Borysiewicz K., Bartczak M., Cilulko J., Gruszczyński W., Stachowiak J., Ziółek L., Nadużywanie środków odurzających wśród młodzieży miasta Łodzi, „Zdrowie Psychiczne” 1974, nr 1-2.
  27. Sattes H., Allgemeine psychopathologische Probleme und psychiatrische Krankheitsbilder bei Missbrauch und Sucht [w:] W. Steinbrecher, H. Solms, F. Laubenthal, Sucht und Missbrauch, Thieme, Stuttgart 1975.
  28. Schuster Ch.R., Johanson Ch.E., Behavioral Analysis of Opiate Dependence [w:] Opiate Addiction – Origins and Treatment, New York, 1974.
  29. Silver A.M., Some personality characteristics of groups of young drug misusers and delinquents, „British Journal of Addiction” 1977, nr 2.
  30. Szafranek J., Szafranek K., Krąpiec A., Gromek A., Rodzina a powstawanie toksykomanii u młodzieży, „Problemy Rodziny” 1975, nr 3.
  31. Szłabowicz J.W., Toksykomania młodzieży (obserwacje zebrane w przychodni), „Zdrowie Psychiczne” 1973, nr 3.
  32. Täschner K.L., Richtberg W., Badania porównawcze osób uzależnionych od alkoholu i osób uzależnionych od innych środków (tłum. z niemieckiego), „Psychiatria Polska” 1974, nr 3.
  33. Thille Z., Zgirski L., Toksykomanie. Zagadnienia społeczne i kliniczne, Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich, Warszawa 1976.
  34. Tomczak J.W., Toksykomanie w okresie adolescencji, „Zdrowie Psychiczne” 1976, nr 4.
  35. Welbel L., Trudności rozpoznawania stanu zależności lekowej, „Biuletyn Instytutu Psychoneurologicznego” 1975, nr 2.
  36. Wikler A., Einige lerntheoretische Überlegungen zum Problem der Drogenabhängigkeit [w:] R. Ferstl, S. Kraemer (red.), Abhägigkeiten , Urban & Schwarzenberg, München 1976.
  37. Zakrzewski P., Losy życiowe i przestępczość młodych alkoholików, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, Warszawa 1977.
  38. Zakrzewski P., Niekontrolowana grupa koleżeńska a proces społecznego wykolejenia nieletnich. Próba syntezy, „Psychologia Wychowawcza” 1970, nr 5.
  39. Zakrzewski P., Próba rozwarstwienia młodocianych zażywających wielokrotnie środki narkotyczne, „Państwo i Prawo” 1980, nr 8.